Spurs v Ajax TONIGHT

Originally Posted by dunk

Took it well too. Was good first half Sunday, we’ve never seen it often enough or with any consistency though. As the second half proved, he’s easily snuffed out even when playing well.

He’s deffo got slower and weaker as well. Although, have to blame the general fitness regime at United in the last few years to some extent.

you nearly forgot didn’t you

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

My guys

Daley

wasnt feeling his haircut to short

https://twitter.com/azscholes/status/1123312480321777664

Hard to argue tbf

Originally Posted by believe

you nearly forgot didn’t you

Forgot what?

Difficult to forget Mata flatters to deceive and is slow and weak.

Also difficult to forget that half our squad have bellies and are blowing out of their arse after the shortest of sprints

Originally Posted by Switching Off

Total Ajax wage bill approx £46m.

Sanchez is £26m give or take.

Such a team would never happen under woodward because each player is assessed individually in terms of income and cost, rather than considering the whole. Which is why we’ll always be a team of individuals with a fragmented dressing room.

Originally Posted by caliban

Pogba could do with watching a few of these Ajax lads. Two touches max. Move the ball, move to space.

Yeah, but who’s making the money, getting Instagram followers and sponsorships.

Originally Posted by Sapien

https://twitter.com/azscholes/status...12480321777664

Hard to argue tbf

But the solution to having a team full of #@&%!s is to sign players like de ligt.

Ajax Turnover - €90m
United Turnover - £590m

Hence the disparity in wage bills. Agents at Ajax aren't going to ask for £200k a week. Agents at United know the turnover of United and will claim the bulk of it is because of the players, and insist they deserve a fair cut.

Laughably in some cases, but still.

And were we to maintain a wage structure keeping us as low £46m or whatever, there'd be masses of complaints that the wage structure was holding us back, the owners were greedy @#%&!s etc..

Originally Posted by dunk

And were we to maintain a wage structure keeping us as low £46m or whatever, there'd be masses of complaints that the wage structure was holding us back, the owners were greedy @#%&!s etc..

Yeah, that’s what people are asking.