Erling Haaland

Originally Posted by Fat Al

He's a c*** & hugely over-rated.

To think he almost went to United under Ole, which I imagine would have suited his level far better.... Grealish is definitely not worth £100 mill.

Hard to believe he cost the same amount as Haaland.

Originally Posted by westcoastvan

To think he almost went to United under Ole, which I imagine would have suited his level far better.... Grealish is definitely not worth £100 mill.

Hard to believe he cost the same amount as Haaland.

Haaland didn't cost £100m...

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Haaland didn't cost £100m...

Yes he did.

The similar threads are all Waffles

Except the first one

Wouldn't even countenance being managed by Ole again after playing for him at Molde.

He bloody knew!

I don't really understand the point you're making here that we've not had rammed down our throats by every media outlet under the sun.

Yes Haaland is very good. City are very good at playing to his strengths. What do you want us all to have a good cry because he didn't come here?

Exactly, should take a leaf out of Sparky’s book and stop whinging about the blatantly obvious

Originally Posted by Chris Quayd

Exactly, should take a leaf out of Sparky’s book and stop whinging about the blatantly obvious

Originally Posted by westcoastvan

To think he almost went to United under Ole, which I imagine would have suited his level far better.... Grealish is definitely not worth £100 mill.

Hard to believe he cost the same amount as Haaland.

I’ve never believed for a moment he was coming here.

With the Raiola connection and his City/Leeds association, he was always going to have his pick of club and it was never going to be United.

City were going to win the league with or without him. They need to win the Champions League for it to really pay off.

This mercenary #@&%! will be off soon enough and spend his real prime years in Spain.

Originally Posted by dunk

Yes he did.

He cost £54m. (Not including agent fees).

Originally Posted by Switching Off

The similar threads are all Waffles

Except the first one

What can I say, I knew a player when I saw one

Originally Posted by windy waffles

He cost £54m. (Not including agent fees).



What can I say, I knew a player when I saw one

Yeah I'm sure he did. And I bet they made some of that back by selling Jackie Chan some one coat gloss.

He's probably on £54m a week. Or at least will be half way through the season when Daddy and his agents want to renegotiate his contact after he bags his 40th goal of the season in January.

£54 mil

What next, the Francis Lee appreciation thread?

Originally Posted by windy waffles

He cost £54m. (Not including agent fees).



What can I say, I knew a player when I saw one

Fees for agent and his dad were £44m. Are you just pretending they don’t exist? The reason the transfer fee was set so low is so the greedy @#%&!s could get their own transfer fee. He cost £98m.

Why are you trying to pretend City got a bargain?

Absolutely everybody knew this lad was going to bag goals galore, wtf are you trying to gain glory by repeating what everybody knew?

It’s like claiming you know a player because you saw Messi score for Barca at 16, you plum.

Couldn't give a £#%&!. He's a ridiculous goal scorer, there is zero doubt about that. But put Francis Jeffers in this City team and he scores 30.

It's the perfect vomit inducing match.

Originally Posted by dunk

Fees for agent and his dad were £44m. Are you just pretending they don’t exist? The reason the transfer fee was set so low is so the greedy @#%&!s could get their own transfer fee. He cost £98m.

Why are you trying to pretend City got a bargain?

Absolutely everybody knew this lad was going to bag goals galore, wtf are you trying to gain glory by repeating what everybody knew?

It’s like claiming you know a player because you saw Messi score for Barca at 16, you plum.

I was taking the piss re knowing a player when I see one ffs.

Who is Messi?

£100m is still a bargain.

Originally Posted by Wayne Jenkins

City were going to win the league with or without him. They need to win the Champions League for it to really pay off.

This mercenary #@&%! will be off soon enough and spend his real prime years in Spain.

I distinctly remember many of us saying the same about Aguero and even David Silva. Didn't happen.

Originally Posted by dunk

Fees for agent and his dad were £44m. Are you just pretending they don’t exist? The reason the transfer fee was set so low is so the greedy @#%&!s could get their own transfer fee. He cost £98m.

Why are you trying to pretend City got a bargain?

Absolutely everybody knew this lad was going to bag goals galore, wtf are you trying to gain glory by repeating what everybody knew?

It’s like claiming you know a player because you saw Messi score for Barca at 16, you plum.

If his true cost was £54m then there's no way barcelona, bayern or madrid wouldn't have been at the front of the line. The fact is he cost near on £100m all things considered. Nobody ever says "Pogba cost United £69m" do they? No because he had 20 million in agents fees on top of that.

The fact is none of these other clubs were willing to entertain handing over 44 million to his dad and his agent.