Not selling Heinze to the Vermin.And a Cahill question.

With hindsight, a very bad move.


At the time though, I suppose I was like every other United fan and just didn't want us to sell to them.


Secondly, would Tim Cahill get into our team? And/or, would you like us to make a move for him in the summer?

Thanks for your time on these very diverse questions.

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

With hindsight, a very bad move.


At the time though, I suppose I was like every other United fan and just didn't want us to sell to them.


Secondly, would Tim Cahill get into our team? And/or, would you like us to make a move for him in the summer?

Thanks for your time on these very diverse questions.

can't see why selling him to real was a bad move. cahill would.

i appreciate this platform you have given me.

Not the type of player we need.

If we do get him, we'd still have midfield issues, but we would score a hell of lot more goals without creating more chances. He's the closest thing to Scholes was back in the day with popping up at the right time in the right place.

I suppose scoring more goals with just one signing is a good one, so yeh.

Cahill would be a good squad player - maybe he'd compliment Hargo well next season. Still think Carrick is a better all round player despite his lack of goals.

I never want to see somebody who I respected having played in our shirt play for them - ever. I'd even be gutted if the Djemba twins turned up in any of their shit shirts.

Cahill is a very good player who I rate.

If Hargreaves is going to be fit next season then there will not be a place for him. If on the other hand he will still be struggling then a move for him would not be a bad idea.

I would decided after taking doctor's advice.

Originally Posted by Argentina

Not the type of player we need.

If we do get him, we'd still have midfield issues, but we would score a hell of lot more goals without creating more chances. He's the closest thing to Scholes was back in the day with popping up at the right time in the right place.

I suppose scoring more goals with just one signing is a good one, so yeh.

Heinze is a defender, mate.

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

With hindsight, a very bad move.


At the time though, I suppose I was like every other United fan and just didn't want us to sell to them.


Secondly, would Tim Cahill get into our team? And/or, would you like us to make a move for him in the summer?

Thanks for your time on these very diverse questions.

Ahem...........do you mean "Super Timmy Cahill"? If so yes.

As for your first qestion, I think Ferie was right not to sell to the mickeys.

Hth. Mull x

Originally Posted by MUFC One Love

Heinze is a defender, mate.

Originally Posted by MUFC One Love

Heinze is a defender, mate.

Sometimes debatable !

He was never the same after his big injury.

I wanted shut of Heinze, and as much as I don't want to sell to Liverpool, under any circumstances, I wasn't that fussed about Heinze landing there, especially if he was going to play LB.

As for Cahill, no. Not a good enough all round player. Good for goal getting, not much else, tbh.

Cahill would get a lot of games for United. He can play just about anywhere in midfield or upfront.

Originally Posted by dunk

I wanted shut of Heinze, and as much as I don't want to sell to Liverpool, under any circumstances, I wasn't that fussed about Heinze landing there, especially if he was going to play LB.

As for Cahill, no. Not a good enough all round player. Good for goal getting, not much else, tbh.

Disagree with the Cahill bit.

Originally Posted by armchair

Cahill would get a lot of games for United. He can play just about anywhere in midfield or upfront.

agree.

The reason Cahill plays upfront or just off the striker for Everton is because he isn't much cop in midfield (and the injuries, obviously), were he at United, he wouldn't get near the midfield, he is a smaller, weaker, poorer Frank Lampard, who can head the ball. Up front he gets goals with his ability to head the ball and Everton's tactics. He wouldn't get a game upfront for United, either, IMO.

Fellaini is where it's at

Top red

Sleazy @#%&!

He'd consider Barcelona but never Liverpool.

said all the right things

Cahill is Very overated. He wouldnt get many games for United.

He works and trys hard...Thats about it.

Poor mans Darren Fletchageddon.

cahill is a far better and more effective player than anderson. i don't see an argument against that really. so if we're going to entertain the fact that anderson is going get games then you'd have to say cahill would.

Anderson is a completely different type of player. I don't think I've ever even seen him head the ball.