Erling Haaland

Originally Posted by jem

if they want to win the cl, they should buy a couple of centre-halves.

if aguero gets injured, they will play jesus or go without a centre-forward (again).

they can't buy everyone. they're not mou-era chelsea.

maybe haaland wanted to play clean?

Ok, Barcelona then. They’re absolutely gagging for a centre forward.

But we both know this isn’t about regular market forces, don’t we? If it were, every single top club in the entire world would have been in for him.

Originally Posted by utd99

Ok, Barcelona then. They’re absolutely gagging for a centre forward.

But we both know this isn’t about regular market forces, don’t we? If it were, every single top club in the entire world would have been in for him.

did you miss the bit about haaland wanting to play clean?

to win the cl (or do better in their respective leagues), city or barca would want a finished article type, not a prospect. I think dortmund will have been pleasantly surprised by his immediate impact, but let's see how he does when he's had his legs taken from under him a few times.

Originally Posted by jem

did you miss the bit about haaland wanting to play clean?

to win the cl (or do better in their respective leagues), city or barca would want a finished article type, not a prospect. I think dortmund will have been pleasantly surprised by his immediate impact, but let's see how he does when he's had his legs taken from under him a few times.

The Chinese lad we've just loaned is the focus of our attack. Focus on that.

Originally Posted by Cream

The Chinese lad we've just loaned is the focus of our attack. Focus on that.

ok. the chinaman with the tan is the focus of our attack because we didn't buy haaland. is that what you meant? if not, this might not be the thread. not sure if odion is the back-to-goal type, but he's a decent enough player and he's better than chong.

Originally Posted by jem

ok. the chinaman with the tan is the focus of our attack because we didn't buy haaland. is that what you meant? if not, this might not be the thread. not sure if odion is the back-to-goal type, but he's a decent enough player and he's better than chong.

Yes, I think that is what I meant.

Originally Posted by jem

ok. the chinaman with the tan is the focus of our attack because we didn't buy haaland. is that what you meant? if not, this might not be the thread. not sure if odion is the back-to-goal type, but he's a decent enough player and he's better than chong.

Speaking of tans,
I still can't get over the fact that Ndombele's first name is' Tanguy'

Originally Posted by d_knight

Speaking of tans,
I still can't get over the fact that Ndombele's first name is' Tanguy'

Cos...? Its not a sin?

Originally Posted by Neo

You're a £#%&!ing awful poster.

yhgr

100% conversion rates.

Seven shots on goal, seven goals.

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Diving @#%&!...

Sancho though

https://youtu.be/eDsgCTbwPCo

How shit are the Keepers in that league? Stephen Hawkings would have got down quicker

Originally Posted by windy waffles

We should have signed him..

If you think otherwise you're an idiot.

And we’d have said the same about pogba, Di Maria and Sanches if we hadn’t have signed them. There’s more to it than just talent.

We have no idea why we didn’t sign him. Could be on the club, could be on the player and agent. One thing for sure is woodward and the glazers are c***s; and the player, his dad and agent have no feeling for united.

Originally Posted by jem

if we had got haaland and fernandes at the beginning of the window, we'd be in fourth place and in a cup final.

Jem’s actually right

Originally Posted by jem

raiola is a cancer on the game. but we wouldn't be "investing our future" in haaland. we'd have had a focus to our attack. we could always buy someone else or bring someone through. right now, we don't have a centre-forward and £18mio is nothing. nothing. about the price of a winger with no tricks who falls over a lot. it's the sort of amount you keep in the armrest.

It was much more than that if the money to the agent and father is to be believed. Plus there’s the pogba situation and dynamic that’s created. If the player had a different agent he’d probably be here now. The fact he’s not could be down to any number of things - the money the agent was demanding from united, the terms of the deal with regards clauses, the politics of the pogba situation, or raiola steering the player away from the club because he doesn’t think it’s the best environment for his development. We have no idea.

Originally Posted by d_knight

How are we 'one of the biggest clubs in the world' at the moment?

Please elaborate

The same way we were still the biggest club in Britain when we were relegated and went 26 years without winning the league.

Originally Posted by windy waffles

100% conversion rates.

Seven shots on goal, seven goals.

Originally Posted by Jammy Dodger

And we’d have said the same about pogba, Di Maria and Sanches if we hadn’t have signed them. There’s more to it than just talent.

We have no idea why we didn’t sign him. Could be on the club, could be on the player and agent. One thing for sure is woodward and the glazers are c***s; and the player, his dad and agent have no feeling for united.



Jem’s actually right



It was much more than that if the money to the agent and father is to be believed. Plus there’s the pogba situation and dynamic that’s created. If the player had a different agent he’d probably be here now. The fact he’s not could be down to any number of things - the money the agent was demanding from united, the terms of the deal with regards clauses, the politics of the pogba situation, or raiola steering the player away from the club because he doesn’t think it’s the best environment for his development. We have no idea.



The same way we were still the biggest club in Britain when we were relegated and went 26 years without winning the league.

Maybe he isn't in Pochettio's plans and club decided not to pursue...

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Maybe he isn't in Pochettio's plans and club decided not to pursue...

Don’t be alarmed, but I’ve noticed you’re subconsciously morphing the word Pochettino into Pinnochio...

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Maybe he isn't in Pochettio's plans and club decided not to pursue...

Aye, heard he prefers moving Lingard up front.

Another two goals last night against PSG.

What a player.

Originally Posted by jem

ok. the chinaman with the tan is the focus of our attack because we didn't buy haaland. is that what you meant? if not, this might not be the thread. not sure if odion is the back-to-goal type, but he's a decent enough player and he's better than chong.

For once I agree with you.

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Another two goals last night against PSG.

What a player.

No mate. He's very raw.

One word - Mina Raiola

Originally Posted by Sapien

No mate. He's very raw.

Ok.

Hes scored more goals in the CL this season than Barcelona.

Will be the best striker in the world within two years.