|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I don't think it would be a problem and I'd love to see him here. He'd be ideal, but I genuinely don't think we're interested. He'd be here by now if we were and Fergie has already all but ruled out a move for striker. Can't see it happening. Sorry Pure. |
|
||||
|
||||
It'll be January when we realise he isn't up to much and that stay of execution is ended. I hope to be proven wrong as he's a very good player when fit however I can't help but feel we're setting ourselves up for a fall by putting too much stock in his return.
As for buying a new striker in January, oh dear. |
|
||||
|
||||
When have United ever spent big money on a 28/29 year old?
Anelka is neer going to happen, it would be a knee jerk signing and United never do that, or at least they don't do it and spend £10m. The only chance of a striker is if they have one in their sights and have had for a while and they decide to bring forward the purchase a la Ronaldo and Rooney. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
Similar Threads for: just cant help believing anelka should have been brought in for tevez | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Man United's Anthony Martial 'almost conned us' into believing he was a No 9, says Paul Scholes | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 13-10-2020 10:20 AM |
What's the anelka celebration investigation about? | DakotaFredsBigShoe | Football | 77 | 12-01-2015 05:12 PM |
So United may still be after Anelka? | antonin jablonsky | Football | 59 | 05-06-2007 07:31 PM |
Utd don't want Anelka | Whalefish | Football | 93 | 04-06-2007 04:08 PM |
Nicolas Anelka | Rhodzy | Football | 77 | 04-06-2007 10:14 AM |