Sewerage at it again

Originally Posted by Pop

http://www.thefa.com/News/governance...AB4D7313F.ashx

NRAT (will later)

Originally Posted by Pop

http://www.thefa.com/News/governance...AB4D7313F.ashx

right then, let me get my glasses and get a cup of tea.

Fair enough really.

They have taken the view that he doesn't actually show any regret for what he did because he feels the 3 game ban was enough, and that it wasn't anything out of the ordinary.

If he hadn't done that he would be looking at 6 or 7 imo.

Originally Posted by Pop

http://www.thefa.com/News/governance...AB4D7313F.ashx

All those vermin "if there is no mark he didn't bite"

Well he admitted it in his submission........


They will simply ignore his admission in much the same way they ignore the fact he admitted he called Evra a negro :shakehead:

Originally Posted by Pop

http://www.thefa.com/News/governance...AB4D7313F.ashx

we did not take into consideration any previous Disciplinary Records of Mr Suarez and considered the offence in isolation.

We disagreed with the submissions made by Mr Suarez that the three-match suspension for violent conduct is set by FIFA
or as stipulated by Laws of the Game, and the implication that we ought to give regards to this

We found that biting an opponent in itself was extremely shocking, unexpected and truly exceptional. Whilst there are numerous violent conduct cases arising out of physical bodily contact between players, the incidents
of biting an opponent are very rare

Mr Suarez further submitted that this was not a case where a sanction in addition to the standard punishment is required to act as deterrence to other players as the nature of the incident is extremely rare.
In short, players throughout the game know that biting an opponent is not acceptable behaviour and do not need to see Mr Suarez receive a ban in excess of the standard punishment to be discouraged from acting in such a manner

Mr Suarez contended that, whilst not seeking to diminish his own actions, it is his reputation that has been damaged.

Wtf

Originally Posted by thenorthwillriseagain

yeah liverpool bought him after he cheated ghana out of the world cup innit

That's just about the most sporting thing he's ever done.

In reference to the Evra case when told Suarez had admitted it and that was obviously used as evidence someone actually said to me 'well I shot bin laden. Does that count as evidence?'

62. Mr Suarez contended that, whilst not seeking to diminish his own actions, it is his reputation that has been damaged.

Always the victim :shakehead:

We took into consideration of Mr Suarez’s apology, his personal statement, supporting letter from Mr Brendan Rodgers and the letter from Ms Zoe Ward. But when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez’s denial of the standard punishment that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly insufficient, it seemed to us that Mr Suarez has not fully appreciated the gravity and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident

They really didn't like him telling them what ban to give him.

We took into consideration of
Mr Suarez’s apology, his personal statement,
supporting letter from Mr Brendan Rodgers
and the
letter from Ms Zoe Ward
.
B
ut
when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez’s denial of
the
standard punishment
that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly
insufficient
,
it seemed to us
that
Mr Suarez
has not
fully
appreciated
the gravity
and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident.

Dropped himself in it there

No idea wtf happened with that c&p

T
hey
can never admit
they were in the wrong
@#%&!s

Originally Posted by Zorg

They really didn't like him telling them what ban to give him.

Looks like he had a magistrate on the panel.

I almost feel sorry for him.

We took into consideration of Mr Suarez’s apology, his personal statement,
supporting letter from Mr Brendan Rodgers and the letter from Ms Zoe Ward.
But when these were read in conjunction with Mr Suarez’s denial of the
standard punishment that would otherwise apply for violent conduct is clearly
insufficient, it seemed to us that Mr Suarez has not fully appreciated the gravity
and seriousness of this truly exceptional incident.

Essentially, his claims that he should only serve a 3 match ban contributed to the ban being increased

Whilst we could not reasonably be expected to consider or understand the state of mind of Mr Suarez at the time, it would be preposterous to conclude that it was not an intentional act.

Makes for great reading tbh.

The FA stated that such an incident has a deleterious effect on the image of the game of football in this country. It serves to undermine the integrity and reputation of the sport. Furthermore Mr Suarez’s conduct has damaged the image of English football across the globe.

Love the FA tbh.

The FA appointed the following members to the Regulatory Commission (“the Commission” , “We”) to hear this case:

Mr. David Gill
Sir Alex Ferguson
Mr. Patrick Crerand
Mr. Peter Boyle
reddles
bellers

Looks like they've got a point tbf.

Not enough self pity??

Shoehorn a reference to Hillsborough in

You know the line that pisses me off the most - the one where they say the Mr Suarez does not seem the realise the gravity of the situation.That from the FA who allowed a game to be played in a stadium they knew to be unsafe

Originally Posted by Mao's Favourite Starling

Not enough self pity??

Shoehorn a reference to Hillsborough in

You know the line that pisses me off the most - the one where they say the Mr Suarez does not seem the realise the gravity of the situation.That from the FA who allowed a game to be played in a stadium they knew to be unsafe

don't forget Mr Suarez donated his 'fine' by the rat muchers straight to the Hillsborough appeal.....what a stand-up guy, when he's not falling over

If he goes, Liverpool will be fighting relegation next season, nqat.

I have genuine hate for this player - but that can't discredit his footballing ability.

Originally Posted by Mao's Favourite Starling

Not enough self pity??

Shoehorn a reference to Hillsborough in

You know the line that pisses me off the most - the one where they say the Mr Suarez does not seem the realise the gravity of the situation.That from the FA who allowed a game to be played in a stadium they knew to be unsafe

This from a set of fans who put up a banner celebrating the fact that their murderous actions got their local rivals' best ever team banned from European competition through no fault of their own.

You know, seeing we're playing that game.