Quote:
Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky
They are gonna use the investment to pay off the debts aren't they so they can stop paying interest and start paying themselves and the investors dividends.
|
no, they aren't. what £#%&!wit would say "you keep the billion, I'll have a few million a year maybe" instead?
Quote:
Originally Posted by forwardirektion
How much of their own capital have they put in?
The club is easily paying off the debt and still competing so they will not wipe the debt with the $1bn they will take it for themselves.
Say they put $500m of their own money in they are making a $500m profit while retaining complete control and being able to pay themselves dividends for the years to come.
|
why on earth would you say they put $500mio? I doubt they put in $50mio.
Quote:
Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky
So, as far as united are concerned it will be of no benefit at all and in fact will take even more money out of the club to pay dividends. Seems Ginners is correct, worst possible scenario
|
no reason more dividends will go out. but it won't be any more use to united than the takeover.
Quote:
Originally Posted by dunk
I think they will pay the debt off, or at least a portion of it to ensure we remain in line with the fair play regulations, and their ultimate aim will be to pay off the debt I would've thought.
|
ha, ha, ha, ha..... bonk.
Quote:
Originally Posted by General Woundwort
If they get a $1bn return and keep a controlling stake 6 years after buying the club for £800mil, they've played an absolute blinder tbf.
Doesn't it make you £#%&!ing puke.
|
yup. makes me puke how they can rely on apathy, ignorance and lack of proper regulation.