Best Ever Premiership XI

Originally Posted by Switching Off

Non United best XI would be interesting.

Seaman

Petrescu---Campbell---Adams---Cole

Pires---Lampard---Ginola

Zola---Bergkamp

Henry

Subs
Fowler
Shearer
Viera
Speed
Desailly
Pearce
James

would fancy a utd xi to beat the best of the rest comfortably.

edit: gary speed?

Originally Posted by Ginners

Think he means you picking Gerrard and Lampard over older players like Viera, Petit etc.

Fair play though if you think you can get them to gel in a 4-4-2.

Originally Posted by fix up look SHARPE

would fancy a utd xi to beat the best of the rest comfortably.

edit: gary speed?

Sorry, was doing a Ginners and picked him based on appearances

what is everyones utd 11?

schmikes

neville
rio
vidic
evra

giggs
keane
scholes
ronaldo

cole
cantona

anyone got a different midfield to that?

Originally Posted by Ginners

what is everyones utd 11?

schmikes

neville
rio
vidic
evra

giggs
keane
scholes
ronaldo

cole
cantona



anyone got a different midfield to that?

Cole? Go on then...I'll nibble.

Originally Posted by suedeshoes

Cole? Go on then...I'll nibble.

flip of a coin between him and rooney, cole is my 2nd favourite utd player and i think he would work well with cantona

Cantona HAS to be in this XI.

This really is a case where the appelation "end of" is justified, imo

Don't understand how you can have a greatest premiership XI containing a player who has never won it.

Originally Posted by Ginners

rio
vidic

Originally Posted by Big Norm

Don't understand how you can have a greatest premiership XI containing a player who has never won it.

£#%&! it then, Ripley in for Ginola.

Originally Posted by Big Norm

Don't understand how you can have a greatest premiership XI containing a player who has never won it.

Out of interest, why not?

Originally Posted by Ginners

flip of a coin between him and rooney, cole is my 2nd favourite utd player and i think he would work well with cantona

He didn't.

Love Cole but he was poor in comparison to many others we've had, Ruud, Hughes, Ole to name but 3.

Originally Posted by Big Norm

Don't understand how you can have a greatest premiership XI containing a player who has never won it.

the best players dont always play for the best teams, look at le tiss. he would easily be on my bench.

Originally Posted by red in cumbria

Out of interest, why not?

Because the player in question is Gerard.

Originally Posted by suedeshoes

He didn't.

Love Cole but he was poor in comparison to many others we've had, Ruud, Hughes, Ole to name but 3.

is this the same ole that was 3rd choice when cole was at the club?

hughes is a @#%&!

forgot about ruud

Originally Posted by Big Norm

Because the player in question is Gerard.

Ah yes, that goes without saying. But you made it sound like a statement of principle

Originally Posted by Ginners

is this the same ole that was 3rd choice when cole was at the club?

Ollie was better as an impact player back then. It was only later when we started playing him wide right that he actually became a regular starter. Fancy Chicho to have a similar path tbh.

Originally Posted by Ginners

is this the same ole that was 3rd choice when cole was at the club?

hughes is a @#%&!

Ole was beter than Cole. Fact. End of. Shut it.


This premier league side has to have Shearer in it. @#%&! and that but the best number 9 I've seen

Originally Posted by suedeshoes

Ole was beter than Cole. Fact. End of. Shut it.

well fergie disagrees, so me and fergie can have cole and you can have ole.

Originally Posted by Ginners

well fergie disagrees, so me and fergie can have cole and you can have ole.

Fergie signed Bebe.

One-on-one with keeper to slot home and win the league. Which one do you want on the ball, Ole or Cole?