the importance of park

Originally Posted by hollowman

they are ok. but i prefer your first which hit the nail on the head.



regarding this description of park.

i agree 100%
its all that that gives me the confidence to stick my neck out and say he is one of the best in his position in europe.

At doing what he does, he probably is, as he isn't a 'Winger' as such.

I wouldn't say Tevez is one of the best in his position as a striker, but probably is in terms of what he actually does.

If you had an ounce of intelligence or education, you would be able to see the point I am making here rather than getting hug up on the player comparison and who is better. Something I have never once mentioned, intimated or alluded too.

But you just £#%&!ing LOVE your player comparisons, don't you Marlo You're too £#%&!ing easy.

Originally Posted by Coracao

Correct. Anderson didn't prove anything in terms of assists. Decent passing at times, but nothing really incisive. He may have got 1 assist, I think that was about it.

agreed.
i love this post of yours by the way from earlier today.

Originally Posted by Coracao

Park has proven in the past that he is capable of creating and scoring goals. In his first season, I believe he had numerous assists (I'm not sure if he was top of the list, but he wasn't far off).

I'm not sure someone who constantly bleats on about Anderson should be slagging off other players for their lack of goals and assists. Especially players who have shown they are capable in the past, when Anderson has shown next to nothing.

it basically says park can be excused because he showed he can do in the past.(a)
also says anderson ha shown next to nothing since being at the club.(b)

thats quite a contrast to this post of yours from last year.
http://www.utdforum.com/forum/showpo...4&postcount=32

Originally Posted by Coracao

Carrick is not in his debut season.

And passing to a red shirt isn't that difficult.

He does not impose himself whatsoever.

He doesn't stick his foot in and win enough tackles.

He doesn't bomb forward and get into the box.(b)

Last season, is last season. It means £#%&! all.(a)

This season he has been poor. Anderson should be picked ahead of him everytime.

It is Anderson and ANOTHER.

Already.

And he is £#%&!ing 19!

anyone know a coroner????

Originally Posted by hollowman

agreed.
i love this post of yours by the way from earlier today.

it basically says park can be excused because he showed he can do in the past.(a)
also says anderson ha shown next to nothing since being at the club.(b)

thats quite a contrast to this post of yours from last year.
http://www.utdforum.com/forum/showpo...4&postcount=32


anyone know a coroner????

not that busy then?

Originally Posted by wonky no

not that busy then?

Originally Posted by hollowman

agreed.
i love this post of yours by the way from earlier today.

it basically says park can be excused because he showed he can do in the past.(a)
also says anderson ha shown next to nothing since being at the club.(b)

thats quite a contrast to this post of yours from last year.
http://www.utdforum.com/forum/showpo...4&postcount=32


anyone know a coroner????

I'm glad to see you have missed the point with most of my points Marlo...

I said Anderson had proved nothing in terms of assists and goals, which was the topic YOU brought up with regards to Park. And I didn't say Park should be excused from anything. He has the ability to create was my point, not that he has created in the past, so he never needs to create again.

In addition, I do rate Anderson highly. But unlike you, I don't have my #@&%! lodged firmly up his arse. He has gone backwards a hell of a lot over the past 12 months. And yes, Carrick has proved me wrong. I'm big enough to admit that.

Park is gash.

Should not be anywhere near the 1st team when other players are fit.

Originally Posted by Alan

Park is gash.

Should not be anywhere near the 1st team when other players are fit.

possibly your most clueless ever post, for example

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

possibly your most clueless ever post, for example

And this is one of your most predictable ones, too.

is, indeed, gash.

tevez has no vision, no touch on his passing and shoots wildly. every goal he has scored could just as easily have hit the corner flag.

fletch is a talentless git as well.

they are all jolly enthusiastic so we applaud their effort. tevez is tireless in closing down people (every now and then he even makes contact with the ball, just to show it's not a complete waste of time).

but, let's be honest, along with o'shea, we could replace all of them tomorrow and see change from a 20.

it's lucky every other team in the league is shit or we'd be mid-table.

Originally Posted by jem

is, indeed, gash.

tevez has no vision, no touch on his passing and shoots wildly. every goal he has scored could just as easily have hit the corner flag.

fletch is a talentless git as well.

they are all jolly enthusiastic so we applaud their effort. tevez is tireless in closing down people (every now and then he even makes contact with the ball, just to show it's not a complete waste of time).

but, let's be honest, along with o'shea, we could replace all of them tomorrow and see change from a 20.

it's lucky every other team in the league is shit or we'd be mid-table.

I'm amazed we've won so much with so many shit players in our team/squad

Originally Posted by wiganste

I'm amazed we've won so much with so many shit players in our team/squad

you're telling me!

but look at the £#%&!ing opposition.

chelsea at old trafford... what a £#%&!ing shower.

Originally Posted by jem

tevez is tireless in closing down people.

he hasn't got round to you yet which is a bit of a shame. or alan, for example

What do you gents think Park brings to the side?

To me, he brings lots of enthusiasm, lots of running, and a decent end product in maybe 1 attempt from 10.

An ideal player to have in the squad who will sit on the bench and not complain, is about where it begins and ends in my opinion.

This £#%&!fest over an ordinary and often poor quality footballer is bizarre, or perhaps an elaborate WUM.

a lot from alan.

a £#%&!ing army of tevezes couldn't close me down. I don't think he'd make past the border patrol into my zone of terror.

from nevland today, incidentally. reminds me of an uncomplaining substitute we had. :0)

I can't be arsed slagging of individual players, partly because to be fair Park is having a very good run of form. But to compare him to Tevez is just taking the piss.

If Fergie really thought that Park was good enough as a long term solution to the winger problem, he wouldnt have signed Tosic and be in the market for Valencia.

Originally Posted by Ether

I can't be arsed slagging of individual players, partly because to be fair Park is having a very good run of form. But to compare him to Tevez is just taking the piss.

If Fergie really thought that Park was good enough as a long term solution to the winger problem, he wouldnt have signed Tosic and be in the market for Valencia.

The point being, he was never, at any point, compared to Tevez.

park was awesome today, love the lad

woah. im baffed at the level of praise Park is getting.

he had a good game, didnt stop running and the defenders life hell.

but lets be honest as a creative force on the wing he's shit.

ill be the first to say that he has improved but for all that running on the wing he didnt manage to get one cross past the 1st man. the same thing happened @ WBA

the same people rejoicing at Parks ability to run non stop for the duration of the match would be the first to start laying into Nani for a misplaced cross/pass.

when in reality Nani takes the greater risks in his pass selection or attacking play.