|
||||
|
||||
Big Jim loves United
He’s waited all his life for this opportunity Except for the time he got out muscled when trying to buy the renters….. …… by a bunch of clowns currently £#%&!ing it up Meanwhile Newcastle and the Divs are solidly rising to/ dominating the top respectively with ME money SHOULD Qatar buy US you can bet your bottom petro dollar the EPL will suddenly choose to actually rigorously enforce FFP But at least we will be on that level playing field to be regulated …… whereas with Jim’s balls we’ll be told we still have to find value as the club must sustain itself including past debts……. As the barcodes and Bert’s with an EPL token gesture ease past FFP Jim wants you all distracted with whether a couple of impotent Glazers is good or bad still involved. The question for me is if we don’t get the Qataris on board will the EPL really get to grips with the Saudis and Abuh Dhabis …oh yes and will they buy the Verm instead. It wouldn’t bother me if Ratcliffe did somehow and that’s a worry Question for the forum accountants….. if the debt is moved into inios books is that classed as income for the club or just shifting it from one creditor to another with the club still liable? |
|
||||
|
||||
If we had real fans who just basically refused to go in the ground for the last couple of homes games they would sell. It’s been done before. The protests since 1958 have been great , but those @#%&!s are still here and if Jim gets it still gonna be around. Has to be 100 of nothing.
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
There's nothing to stop any owner putting debt on the club. But the banks are going to very much prefer that it stay with the company that makes a lot more money. They aren't looking to buy United to take money out of it, they don't need to. Again if that sounds like I'm all in on Ineos and Ratcliffe I'm not but people need to stop thinking that it's the Glazers all over again because it's not. Based on all available evidence anyway.
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Or that he can't stump up enough of the purported 6m to own the club outright. Quote:
You're like the ugly girl at the dance, desperate for some attention, aren't you? You keep tonguing arses whilst pretending hopelessly that everything about 'Big' Jim's bid is all you hoped it would be. #@&%!. |
|
||||
|
||||
They make £2-3 billion a year in profit in recent years. £69 billion would be the revenue. But they don't need to take £100m a year from United to fund the ownership. They're many multiple times bigger than United. Obviously there's a risk that they could take money out if they decide to but I don't see why they would. The Glazers didn't have any other income streams.
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Jim, Joel and Avram. Patting each other on the back, draped in United scarves and drooling at the thought of the size of the next dividend. |
Similar Threads for: The Glazer Reign Is Crumbling | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This is the story of Ed Woodward's Man United reign - he knows he failed to deliver | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 06-01-2022 12:40 PM |
Timeline: Glazers and their turbulent reign at Manchester United | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 02-05-2021 07:00 PM |
Eric cautioned for Assault - When will his reign of terror end? | irk | Football | 39 | 14-03-2014 10:49 AM |
well, we're into the last 30 minutes or so of Big Freggleson's reign ! | Fountz | Football | 294 | 04-07-2013 07:24 AM |
4 Forwards from SAFs reign. | magic_cantona | Football | 90 | 14-12-2012 03:45 AM |