100000000000007 Great comedy Man City moments

But will anything actually be done about it? Ever??

Wait till they start paying Harland £600k pw

I bet they wouldn’t even turn over £350m if their sponsorships were genuine ffs.

Originally Posted by dunk

I bet they wouldn’t even turn over £350m if their sponsorships were genuine ffs.

they wouldn't turn over 350m if they struck gold in the car park the cheating @#%&!s

Originally Posted by dunk

I bet they wouldn’t even turn over £350m if their sponsorships were genuine ffs.

They wouldn’t turn over £3.50 the tinpot @#%&!s

Originally Posted by The Stella Fella

Wait till they start paying Harland £600k pw

He won't join City. Here he is recently protesting Qatar's human rights violations. I imagine he'll be equally disgusted with the UAE's track record and will tell Mansour where to stick his £600k a week....

This whole Raiola model is on borrowed time, it has to be. I can’t believe clubs have dealt with this so badly.

Originally Posted by Pop

"Struggling financially"

https://twitter.com/ESPNFC/status/1379765904519667720

De Bruyne is supposed to be on £400k a week btw.

The way city are continuing, the league will turn into Scottish football, I'm already losing interest with only one team winning and boring us all at the same time!

Originally Posted by originalhogg

The way city are continuing, the league will turn into Scottish football, I'm already losing interest with only one team winning and boring us all at the same time!

Which is different to Liverpool's and our eras how?

Originally Posted by 92ToBury

Which is different to Liverpool's and our eras how?

We got there without a sugar nation and deserved it?

Originally Posted by 92ToBury

Which is different to Liverpool's and our eras how?

Both self sufficient clubs, city just a machine.

Originally Posted by dunk

We got there without a sugar nation and deserved it?

Originally Posted by originalhogg

Both self sufficient clubs, city just a machine.

There was no mention of the how, just that it's boring with one team winning.

Originally Posted by 92ToBury

There was no mention of the how, just that it's boring with one team winning.

There were more teams challenging until the very end. Now not so

Originally Posted by The Stella Fella

There were more teams challenging until the very end. Now not so

The vermin won the title last season.
They ran city close the year before.
City dominated the one before.
It's hardly the prolonged domination people are making out.
It's not like us winning 8 of the first 11 titles, 99/00 by 18 points.

We're just feeling the pain because we're not in a position to do anything about it yet. Similarly with Liverpool, until Fergie arrived and had five years under his belt (and them £#%&!ing up), we had one good season where Choccy scored a lot and we finished second.

Many on the board are under 40 and won't remember a time when we weren't challenging for the title.

Originally Posted by 92ToBury

The vermin won the title last season.
They ran city close the year before.
City dominated the one before.
It's hardly the prolonged domination people are making out.
It's not like us winning 8 of the first 11 titles, 99/00 by 18 points.

We're just feeling the pain because we're not in a position to do anything about it yet. Similarly with Liverpool, until Fergie arrived and had five years under his belt (and them f***ing up), we had one good season where Choccy scored a lot and we finished second.

Many on the board are under 40 and won't remember a time when we weren't challenging for the title.

Erm....?

Originally Posted by Reg Holdsworth

Erm....?

i.e., they're not familiar with our current situation.

Originally Posted by 92ToBury

Which is different to Liverpool's and our eras how?

Liverpool of 1970s and 1980s was on merit and as was United of 1990s and 2000s.

Whats happening at man city is not on merit by any means, its just cheating in plain sight.

Originally Posted by 92ToBury

The vermin won the title last season.
They ran city close the year before.
City dominated the one before.
It's hardly the prolonged domination people are making out.
It's not like us winning 8 of the first 11 titles, 99/00 by 18 points.

We're just feeling the pain because we're not in a position to do anything about it yet. Similarly with Liverpool, until Fergie arrived and had five years under his belt (and them £#%&!ing up), we had one good season where Choccy scored a lot and we finished second.

Many on the board are under 40 and won't remember a time when we weren't challenging for the title.

on the face of it you're right but there's little clues as to the competitveness being slowly eroded out of our league.

The constant record busting number of points being posted up, the huge 20+ game winning streaks every season, 100+ goals being scored

Lets not forget city are on to do the domestic treble for the 2nd time in 3 seasons.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

on the face of it you're right but there's little clues as to the competitveness being slowly eroded out of our league.

The constant record busting number of points being posted up, the huge 20+ game winning streaks every season, 100+ goals being scored

Lets not forget city are on to do the domestic treble for the 2nd time in 3 seasons.

We did the double twice in three seasons when it had been done about three times in a century prior. We added a treble which had never been done a few years after that.

I'm also fairly sure no-one thought we were in any way deserving, breaking transfer records and with much more revenue than anyone else. Self-generated it may have been but commercial tie-ups is pure capitalism, not some sporting merit.

Originally Posted by Chris Quayd

We did the double twice in three seasons when it had been done about three times in a century prior. We added a treble which had never been done a few years after that.

I'm also fairly sure no-one thought we were in any way deserving, breaking transfer records and with much more revenue than anyone else. Self-generated it may have been but commercial tie-ups is pure capitalism, not some sporting merit.

We were rich because we were successful

City are successful because their owners are rich

big difference.