Manchester United agree scheme for fans to own shares in club

On Tuesday MUST held a first online consultation with fans on the agreement, with 99% of those who voted in an exit poll stating they would approve it. The ballot to vote on the scheme closes on Tuesday. If accepted it will then go before United’s board.

...

The scheme would comprise new shares being issued that would be part of a “B” category, meaning they would match those owned by the Glazers, who own United, and have 10 times the voting weight of “A” category, which are owned by most investors.

https://www.theguardian.com/football...s-in-club-must

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1554806398063505408.html

0.8% ownership of the club for £13.2m over 2 years, with a whopping 2.2% of voting rights...

They will never part with enough shares to ever make it meaningful. Also presume in the unlikely event they wanted to offload some shares, they would go to the market and not MUST.
Tick box for the parasites, pointless having voting rights if they are setting the agenda.

Originally Posted by Bobda

0.8% ownership of the club for £13.2m over 2 years, with a whopping 2.2% of voting rights...

They will never part with enough shares to ever make it meaningful. Also presume in the unlikely event they wanted to offload some shares, they would go to the market and not MUST.
Tick box for the parasites, pointless having voting rights if they are setting the agenda.

Yup.

Pointless.

PR exercise...

The horse has obviously bolted but what else can realistically be done other than a very slow build up of shares?

Originally Posted by Chris Quayd

The horse has obviously bolted but what else can realistically be done other than a very slow build up of shares?

Half time pie protest

Originally Posted by Chris Quayd

The horse has obviously bolted but what else can realistically be done other than a very slow build up of shares?

Stop giving them money. It's the only way.Same as it ever was

3 quid a pint though

Originally Posted by rubbernecker

Stop giving them money. It's the only way.Same as it ever was

If it wasn't realistic in '05 not sure it's realistic now

MUST being the corrupt useless @#%&!s they are have bent over, got £#%&!ed and in the process £#%&!ed over Manchester United supporters

£#%&! Drasdo and his mob.

Originally Posted by waynes ear's

MUST being the corrupt useless @#%&!s they are have bent over, got £#%&!ed and in the process £#%&!ed over Manchester United supporters

£#%&! Drasdo and his mob.

What would you have done differently ?

Originally Posted by Parlabane

What would you have done differently ?

Not bother bending over and getting £#%&!ed by a group of parasite @#%&!s only interested in protecting themselves.

The share thing was put about before the protests and was put to MUST before the protests. It doesnt take a genius to work out MUST are a £#%&!ing joke and anyone with half a brain knows that.

The Glazers have no interest in talking to the fans. They’re interested in money and they’re £#%&!ing the club and its fans.

£#%&! MUST and the Glazers

Originally Posted by Chris Quayd

If it wasn't realistic in '05 not sure it's realistic now

Not saying its easy but its more realistic than coloured scarves or keeping giving them money

Not only realistic but after 15 years it should be obvious by now it's the only option that would see them gone.

more lip service from our ceo

I voted "yes"

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Yup.

Pointless.

PR exercise...

Do you get a buffet lunch at the AGM?