|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The idea that there is a manager out there somewhere who can succeed whilst the decisions on who comes and goes are made by other people who clearly know £#%&! all about what they're doing is pretty indicative of what is and has been wrong at the club. It's only a few weeks ago that the current lot decided it would be a good idea to keep Lingard against his will, rather than get him the £#%&! out of here in exchange for actual money. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
they put directors of football in place (just the wrong £#%&!ing ones) if they get the right manager in with a Van der sar and Rangnick, they might get it right? they spent enough money recently |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
On top of that it would take 2-3 years to establish a platform and build on top. No manager would be given the time. Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
they just got it wrong. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
5. Shine his head up real bright and aim a floodlight at it to dazzle keepers |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
It’s more than just “money” also notice how it’s done. They usually make the top 4 don’t spend then finish outside the top for and spend . Happened to LVG and Jose . And it happened to ole . Having a year to sign Sancho. Having Fred forced on Jose. Having VDB forced on ole . Backing is more than just throwing money at a problem. It’s having confidence in giving the manager the control to do what he wants and how to implement it. The board lack the ambition to want to finish top and compete. Their aim is top 4 so he gets “backed” to get top 4 and nothing more Quote:
|