|
||||
|
||||
|
|
||||
|
||||
Wonder if Jim'll give up his Chelsea season ticket?
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I imagine that some of them were excited about the prospect of being owned by the next Man City, with owners who would make United a top club again. If things go south under Ten Hag, and you have talent, you know.....maybe, greener pastures....maybe a chat with agent..... as to where you can win lots of trophies, just sayin. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The next 5 years?!? United use to win a trophy every year. Quote:
Maybe they're not that bothered by the minority sale, and eventually turn things around, or maybe..... |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
At any rate, I'm trying to adjust to the reality that those 20 years of glory (93 - 2013).....probably aren't returning anytime soon. Hard one to swallow. |
|
|||
|
|||
Interesting read for anyone capable of looking further than the BuT hE hIrEd HiS bRoThEr narrative. Also worth noting Nice are currently 2nd in Ligue 1, the only unbeaten team. The Times have been running some articles with interesting bits of info, clearly being fed from INEOS. Quote:
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
It's a shame it's not a full sale, but I think it's clear that INEOS/Jim would have much preferred the original plan of buying the club and transferring the debt away from the club.
But since the club was put up for sale things obviously changed for the Glazers, and at some point they realised there was more value to them to cling on to as much as they could (at least for the time being), and sell 25% to whomever was willing to put the money up. If they did prefer a full sale then they would have just took the money from anaphylactic Giggs and been done with it. This stake INEOS have bought is a silver lining. Not as good as a full sale, but damn better than nothing. It seems as though INEOS have demanded control of the football side of things for their stake, which makes sense. I don't think they'd just throw a cool $1.5B at the club and be happy with next to no say in anything at the club, and be happy to be so intrinsically linked to a club like Man United plodding along doing the bare minimum with a pissed-off fanbase. Especially with how the club has been run over the past decade. Also think the argument that he's just in it for the money and is another parasite is absolute nonsense, because if that was the case, and if it was easy money to leach, then where are all the other rich @#%&!s of the world who seem to be passing at this golden opportunity? Ratcliffe may be the 2nd richest man in the UK, but globally I doubt he makes the top 100. Strange that so many seem to have missed it. I'm delighted we (reportedly) aren't selling to Qatar, and I'm happy enough with the deal that's been reported to go down. I'd be happier if it was a full sale, or a higher percentage, but accepting the realities of the situation, this is significantly better than nothing. If all that has been reported ends up being true, then we'll be in a much better position going forward than we were a year ago. |
Similar Threads for: The Glazer Reign Is Crumbling | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This is the story of Ed Woodward's Man United reign - he knows he failed to deliver | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 06-01-2022 12:40 PM |
Timeline: Glazers and their turbulent reign at Manchester United | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 02-05-2021 07:00 PM |
Eric cautioned for Assault - When will his reign of terror end? | irk | Football | 39 | 14-03-2014 10:49 AM |
well, we're into the last 30 minutes or so of Big Freggleson's reign ! | Fountz | Football | 294 | 04-07-2013 07:24 AM |
4 Forwards from SAFs reign. | magic_cantona | Football | 90 | 14-12-2012 03:45 AM |