Liverpool sign Mascherano

Originally Posted by dodger

Apparently his West Ham contract had a clause that if he played so many games they woul dhave to sign him for £20 million. Expect to see him in and out of the side. They can keep him for all I care.

And West Ham are capable of that sort of outlay aren't they?

Complete shite imo.

Originally Posted by Mancboy1

And West Ham are capable of that sort of outlay aren't they?.

no, that's why he hardly ever played

Originally Posted by Mancboy1

Complete shite imo.

Which bit?

Originally Posted by dodger

no, that's why he hardly ever played




Which bit?

All 0f it.

Why would West Ham agree to such a clause in the first place knowing he'd be useless to their premiership campaign?

Real shame.

player i have liked from afar for a while. ok, so he has a very definite role but in certain formations/styles this very effective. only time will tell with his career as he's only 22. Seems more suited to Serie A than england though.

The exception to the rule stuff is typical of that club.

also, from i've seen he is better than Fletch!!!

As soon as he signs for those @#%&!s he is forever tarnished.

Liverpool will strengthen their squad by signing him. We have Scholes and carrick, no competition for places, no cover for injury, and when one of them is playing poorly we do not have an option on the bench who will not weaken the team.

Originally Posted by Tiberian

Liverpool will strengthen their squad by signing him. We have Scholes and carrick, no competition for places, no cover for injury, and when one of them is playing poorly we do not have an option on the bench who will not weaken the team.

DOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOO OOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOM

Alonso + Sissoko + Maschareno = Gerrard Right wing.


when you consider the other 3 arent exactly mobile enough to hit the flanks.

http://www.westhamfans.org/latest-ne...t-for-west-ham

makes a bit more sense.

Originally Posted by krystalstealsarse

http://www.westhamfans.org/latest-ne...t-for-west-ham

makes a bit more sense.

Not likely, someone who can not structure paragraphs is unlikely to offer an insight into the working of a premier league club

Originally Posted by Mancboy1

All 0f it.

Why would West Ham agree to such a clause in the first place knowing he'd be useless to their premiership campaign?

Portsmouth did with Fernandes.

Mascherano is a world-class player who isn't being given a chance by some prejudice moron of a manager who prefers hugely inferior players at a shit club like West Ham. As a response, Mascherano suggests that it might be best if he moves on to another club.

On the other hand, Owen Hargreaves is at one of the biggest clubs in the world, guaranteed a good amount of appearances, respected by all within the club. Yet as soon as United show an interest he disrespects everyone at Bayern and tries desperately to force a move.

And Mascherano is the one with the 'attitude problem.'

From staring at the World Cup to Hayden Mullins' understudy? He's acted like a saint.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Mascherano is a world-class player who isn't being given a chance by some prejudice moron of a manager who prefers hugely inferior players at a shit club like West Ham. As a response, Mascherano suggests that it might be best if he moves on to another club.

On the other hand, Owen Hargreaves is at one of the biggest clubs in the world, guaranteed a good amount of appearances, respected by all within the club. Yet as soon as United show an interest he disrespects everyone at Bayern and tries desperately to force a move.

And Mascherano is the one with the 'attitude problem.'

From staring at the World Cup to Hayden Mullins' understudy? He's acted like a saint.

Very good post.

Anyone calling him a failure based on his performances at West Ham is an idiot. He's only started about 5 times, and considering the mess that club is in its no suprise he hasn't shone there. Anyone who watched the World Cup can see the kind of ability he has. No better than Fletch? £#%&!ing laughable.

[quote=Ether;116230]Very good post.

Anyone calling him a failure based on his performances at West Ham is an idiot. QUOTE]

thats all you need to say mate.

most on here seem to think only buy english which imo is stupid.

hargreaves is a trier where as javier is a world class talent already.

a player who imo isnt just a defensive midfielder,people just assume he is one due to his tendancy to always just play it safe...

[quote=violater™;116253]

Originally Posted by Ether

Very good post.

Anyone calling him a failure based on his performances at West Ham is an idiot. QUOTE]

thats all you need to say mate.

most on here seem to think only buy english which imo is stupid.

hargreaves is a trier where as javier is a world class talent already.

a player who imo isnt just a defensive midfielder,people just assume he is one due to his tendancy to always just play it safe...

What is he then if not a defensive midfielder? I like the player but have only seen him with Argentina and the few glimpses i did see with West Ham. Evidence?

EDIT: sorry not sure how that came out but i know the post i've bolded is Violater's...