Who's better, us or Spurs?

Originally Posted by Denis Irwell

Robben was done and dusted, coming here, until slimey Pete and their brown envelopes intervened.

Hazard? No value. There was never a choice for him to make.

Yeah I think we backed away from Hazard when the price moved towards £30m.

Got Ashley Young for around £18m the previous summer so can't argue with our sense of value

Originally Posted by jem

both a bit shit. but spurs are better coached.

This with #@&%!s on.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Yeah I think we backed away from Hazard when the price moved towards £30m.

Got Ashley Young for around £18m the previous summer so can't argue with our sense of value

£#%&!ing shameful tbh

Still paying for it now

The club should have went for Pochettino in 2014.. We will probably have to wait now till he goes to Madrid and do the usual couple of years before they give him the sack, so about 3 years till he ends up here.. For all the talk about how good spurs are as soon as he leaves they will collapse

Originally Posted by ziggyman17

For all the talk about how good spurs are as soon as he leaves they will collapse

for all the talk about how good spurs are, no one would notice.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Yeah I think we backed away from Hazard when the price moved towards £30m.

Got Ashley Young for around £18m the previous summer so can't argue with our sense of value

I thought the reason we pulled out was down to agent fees and having to sign his brother to keep him company?

Originally Posted by AK14

I thought the reason we pulled out was down to agent fees and having to sign his brother to keep him company?

Yep, I’m sure signing his brother for £400k was the sticking point.

And Fergal bloody hated agents fees didn’t he?

Originally Posted by Ethers

And Fergal bloody hated agents fees didn’t he?

Originally Posted by Ethers

Yep, I’m sure signing his brother for £400k was the sticking point.

And Fergal bloody hated agents fees didn’t he?

If it was true there would have been no way Fergie would have taken his brother just to please him, He'd have seen such a demand as an insult nqat

As for agent fees, it depends who the agents were...

But yeah, nice try.

Originally Posted by AK14

If it was true there would have been no way Fergie would have taken his brother just to please him, He'd have seen such a demand as an insult nqat

As for agent fees, it depends who the agents were...

But yeah, nice try.

Same Fergie who agreed to sign Tosic just so we could secure a deal for Ljajic? That one?

Originally Posted by Ethers

Same Fergie who agreed to sign Tosic just so we could secure a deal for Ljajic? That one?

Not a clue pal, you tell me

But I'd guess if Hazards representatives were taking the piss with agent fees demands AND asking we take his brother too, that Fergie would have seen it as a mark of disrespect?

No way would he have been bullied in that way IMO.

http://www.skysports.com/football/ne...s-hazard-value

Seems it was agent fees and the overall transfer fee that fergie didn't like.

(That headline )

Originally Posted by AK14

Not a clue pal, you tell me

But I'd guess if Hazards representatives were taking the piss with agent fees demands AND asking we take his brother too, that Fergie would have seen it as a mark of disrespect?

No way would he have been bullied in that way IMO.

http://www.skysports.com/football/ne...s-hazard-value

Seems it was agent fees and the overall transfer fee that fergie didn't like.

(That headline )

£#%&!ing hell.

It’s ok, we’ve got Kagawa and Powell instead for a combined £20m

Originally Posted by Ethers

£#%&!ing hell.

It’s ok, we’ve got Kagawa and Powell instead for a combined £20m

Apology accepted.

Originally Posted by AK14

Apology accepted.

I honestly doubt agents fees were really an issue, but if the big man says they were who am I to disagree.

You were right.

Originally Posted by AK14

Not a clue pal, you tell me

But I'd guess if Hazards representatives were taking the piss with agent fees demands AND asking we take his brother too, that Fergie would have seen it as a mark of disrespect?

No way would he have been bullied in that way IMO.

http://www.skysports.com/football/ne...s-hazard-value

Seems it was agent fees and the overall transfer fee that fergie didn't like.

(That headline )

Another apology, pal?

Pretty sure Fergie signed Kleberson as a mate for Ronaldinho btw. The ultimate £#%&! up

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Another apology, pal?

Pretty sure Fergie signed Kleberson as a mate for Ronaldinho btw. The ultimate f*** up

Who was Djemba Djemba supposed to be a mate for?

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Another apology, pal?

Pretty sure Fergie signed Kleberson as a mate for Ronaldinho btw. The ultimate £#%&! up

It was a genuine question pal, weren't saying what you said was bullshit.

Anyway, see the difference in the links provided compared to yours yesterday? This one had actual quotes, not like your "Ed briefed the press" %@#$&!s

Originally Posted by AK14

It was a genuine question pal, weren't saying what you said was bullshit.

Anyway, see the difference in the links provided compared to yours yesterday?

This one had actual quotes, not like your "Ed briefed the press" %@#$&!s

You expected a press briefing to carry quotes?

Originally Posted by Clarkie

Who was Djemba Djemba supposed to be a mate for?

Roger Milla

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

You expected a press briefing to carry quotes?

I expected you not to make stuff up, should have known better tbh

Originally Posted by AK14

I expected you not to make stuff up, should have known better tbh

Weird apology.

Anyway, we chose not to sign Hazard on money and agent fee grounds. Imagine the stick Ed would get for that