Qatari Bid

Originally Posted by Jack Duckworth

Huge Sunderland away 2012 vibes...

https://twitter.com/SkyKaveh/status/1638671404445888512?s=20

This guy is having some kind of breakdown

It's hilarious watching these news outlets flailing about with completely contradictory reports.

They haven't got a £#%&!ing clue what's going on.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

They haven't got a £#%&!ing clue what's going on.

but will fill hours and pages with stories all about it.

it's worse than transfer deadline day.

Originally Posted by Ethers

https://twitter.com/SkyKaveh/status/...445888512?s=20

This guy is having some kind of breakdown

I'm convinced he's a chatGP bot.....

Originally Posted by Sparky***

It's hilarious watching these news outlets flailing about with completely contradictory reports.

They haven't got a £#%&!ing clue what's going on.

It’s absolutely mental they think they can have their usual football reporters on a multi-billion dollar business deal ffs.

This is the world of high finance, not suited to bullshitters who spend their days texting Harry Redknapp ffs

https://twitter.com/UtdPlug/status/1638676024300036097?s=20

Every single one of them blagging it ..


JIM RADCLIFFE MATCHES QATARIS BID IN NEW SHOCKER


There's another few months if this FFS .

Originally Posted by dunk

The content is as true of Chelsea and City as it is in this instance, if not more so.

United won’t vastly change anything in the league by having an owner like this. The true damage was done when Chelsea and City were financially doped, forced transfer prices up, forced wages up massively and jumped over well ran clubs and pushed them down the pecking order, stole their players and pushed them out of European competition. United having rich owners isn’t the straw that breaks the camel’s back. As I said, where was this energy then? They didn’t care, just as they didn’t care when the Glazer’s stepped in to ruin the league’s flagship club. It’s all fun and games when it’s one in the eye for United, now it looks like it might possible go in our favour the pissing and moaning is never ending.

I’d rather not Qatar, there aren’t any other feasible options though, at least that we know of.

Edit: or Newcastle. Relegation candidates to top 4 challengers in a year which saw them start off by paying £20m for a relegation rival’s main striker, who then ended up relegated before Newcastle gave the striker away on loan a year later.

Yeah, United not having debt repayments and being able to fix up the stadium, that’s the end of the game

Who said that

You keep saying we need Qataris to sort the stadium out because no-one else can afford to do it, others are getting hot under the collar at the prospect of the club rinsing the transfer market.

A: If a club like United needs to be state owned to compete on and off the pitch, then it's all £#%&!ed.

B: United rinsing the transfer market with unlimited money is going to have a knock on effect for the rest of the game.

You can pretend it's not and play the victim game while shooting the messenger whenever someone writes about the negatives, but it doesn't change that fact that they're right about the negatives.

Be good to be owned by a safer state crime wise as opposed to having owners from a country that embraces guns and funded terrorist organisations.

Originally Posted by Dr Stranger

Got to admire the balls on this absolute chancer: bids expected BEFORE the deadline.

What insight!

https://twitter.com/utdplug/status/1...aSbh7vgQsN2lEQ

And even got it wrong….

Originally Posted by Stickman

Be good to be owned by a safer state crime wise as opposed to having owners from a country that embraces guns and funded terrorist organisations.

Originally Posted by Stickman

Be good to be owned by a safer state crime wise as opposed to having owners from a country that embraces guns and funded terrorist organisations.

Originally Posted by Patty_b

Who said that

You keep saying we need Qataris to sort the stadium out because no-one else can afford to do it, others are getting hot under the collar at the prospect of the club rinsing the transfer market.

A: If a club like United needs to be state owned to compete on and off the pitch, then it's all £#%&!ed.

B: United rinsing the transfer market with unlimited money is going to have a knock on effect for the rest of the game.

You can pretend it's not and play the victim game while shooting the messenger whenever someone writes about the negatives, but it doesn't change that fact that they're right about the negatives.

The article is.

I’ve not said we need the Qataris once tbh.

I don’t think anyone has ever said we need the Qataris. It’s just another spin the contrary crew have put on people saying they’d prefer them, a bit like the fact now everyone cares about carrington or the community when they never actually did.

Soz if already posted but BBC saying

'BBC Sport has been told several other proposed investors made their submissions by that time.'

https://www.bbc.co.uk/sport/football/65043304

Originally Posted by believe

I don’t think anyone has ever said we need the Qataris. It’s just another spin the contrary crew have put on people saying they’d prefer them, a bit like the fact now everyone cares about carrington or the community when they never actually did.

Plenty have said that ME money is the way of the world and we either get with the program or get left behind. Why do you think the posters on this very thread are worried about Qatar buying Liverpool?

People don't all of a sudden care about the community/Carrington, people were conditioned to have scaled-down ambition under owners who would struggle to place Manchester on a map and who spent 18 years siphoning money out of the cities most important cultural asset.

Originally Posted by believe

I don’t think anyone has ever said we need the Qataris. It’s just another spin the contrary crew have put on people saying they’d prefer them, a bit like the fact now everyone cares about carrington or the community when they never actually did.

Lots of people have said exactly that

Contrary crew The people talking most about Carrington and the community and the roof are those adamant the Qataris are the only option, so that’s a strange point to make tbh.

Whoever in "Big" Jim's PR team came up with that "community asset" %@#$&!s definitely deserves a pay rise.

Absolute brilliant narrative building.

The Glazers won't care though.

The glazers are apparently “disappointed “ in the lack of competition for bidders.

Just take the money and £#%&! off. You greedy shitheads