Verm v L'Arsenal

That blunder by Reina won me £35 - karma after Burnley equalising in the 90th minutes yesterday cost me £60!

Originally Posted by reem

tyler

'liverpool closing in on what would be an historic victory'.

Have I missed something?

I couldn't believe my eyes when I heard that...what a #@&%!.

Histrionic victory, more like.

£#%&! them both. Perfect result, vermin #@&%!ing it up in the last minute and Arse celebrating a lucky draw like it's a win.

Originally Posted by the heathen

I couldn't believe my eyes when I heard that...what a #@&%!.

Ermm.. You wanna say that again?!

Originally Posted by dragflick

Ermm.. You wanna say that again?!

What's the problem? You've had a mare there. Couldn't believe my ears when I saw you'd quoted my post
:-)

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

Those kind of 'scissor tackles' where a player leaves the floor, jumping in, are nearly always a straight red.Look at Ronaldo's at City where he jumped in, didnt even make contact but still got sent off.Very dangerous tackle.

Agree with the rest, Cole is awful yet the Verm have treated his signing like it's won them the title

£#%&! off. How long have you been watching the game if you think that's a red. 5 years ago it would hardly have been a yellow.
Never a sending off, and Ronaldo was sent off because he proper lunged and jumped, even though he didn't make contact there was still malice and intent.

Originally Posted by Argentina

£#%&! off. How long have you been watching the game if you think that's a red. 5 years ago it would hardly have been a yellow.
Never a sending off, and Ronaldo was sent off because he proper lunged and jumped, even though he didn't make contact there was still malice and intent.

Never a sending off?

He left a "egg sized lump" on the guys shin, had both feet off the ground & took out his standing leg. It could have broken his leg if the tension had manifested itself slightly differently.

Shocking challenge & most definitely should be outlawed.

"I have seen the TV replays and they suggest he is a little bit unlucky. He didn't dive at the player, he dived in front of the ball, and their player got his legs twisted in that,"


Woy's view. Bizarre.

Originally Posted by Argentina

£#%&! off. How long have you been watching the game if you think that's a red. 5 years ago it would hardly have been a yellow.Never a sending off, and Ronaldo was sent off because he proper lunged and jumped, even though he didn't make contact there was still malice and intent.

And twenty years ago the ref would have given him a kiss. We don't live the past though and in the present it's a red.

If they appeal and it's rejected, will he get another game added to his ban?

Originally Posted by That Boy Ronaldo!

If they appeal and it's rejected, will he get another game added to his ban?

No, 'cos the FA have to decide it was a "frivolous" appeal. Will they do that with the Vermin?? Don't hold your breath

Are they actually appealing that?

Originally Posted by Baron_van_Marlon

Are they actually appealing that?

There's talk they might.

Fully expecting them to reject if so and give him a extra one for "wasting there time" but that's the rules, and they always stick to them do the FA.

No matter what level of football, it's a red card

definitely a red but doesnt deserve a 3 game ban for that

Originally Posted by Ginners

definitely a red but doesnt deserve a 3 game ban for that

Yep, 4 for wasting there time.

Originally Posted by That Boy Ronaldo!

If they appeal and it's rejected, will he get another game added to his ban?

No because the FA guidelines clearly state that only Manchester United FC can be charged with a 'frivolous appeal'

Originally Posted by Ginners

definitely a red but doesnt deserve a 3 game ban for that

Isn't the sanction for a straight red?

Originally Posted by Argentina

£#%&! off. How long have you been watching the game if you think that's a red. 5 years ago it would hardly have been a yellow.
Never a sending off, and Ronaldo was sent off because he proper lunged and jumped, even though he didn't make contact there was still malice and intent.

Seems like it's you who needs to '£#%&! off' and it also seems you're in a very small minority of people who think it wasn't a red. How you can imply that Ronaldo's was more of a sending off, is simply bizarre.

Originally Posted by Baron_van_Marlon

Never a sending off?

He left a "egg sized lump" on the guys shin, had both feet off the ground & took out his standing leg. It could have broken his leg if the tension had manifested itself slightly differently.

Shocking challenge & most definitely should be outlawed.

Originally Posted by dodger

And twenty years ago the ref would have given him a kiss. We don't live the past though and in the present it's a red.

Exactly.

Originally Posted by Ginners

definitely a red but doesnt deserve a 3 game ban for that

Straight red for a deemed wreckless challenge that causes an injury or is likely too, is an automatic 3 game ban.I think, anyway.

Definitely one that could go either way and people willhave differing opinions. Of course, in an ideal world, you'd all just accept that it was touch and go and stop getting angry at each other because somebody doesn't agree with you.

I went on RAWK and it was 50/50 between whether it was a red or not.

fwiw imho it was. He deserved it for tucking his shirt in and wearing sandals and trackies for his photo op. Oh, and turning us down for them. Was Bernie Mandic involved?

Anyway, he should get an extra one game ban for a frivolous appeal but he won't because the FA will probably overturn it anyway.

Originally Posted by Switching Off

Definitely one that could go either way and people willhave differing opinions. Of course, in an ideal world, you'd all just accept that it was touch and go and stop getting angry at each other because somebody doesn't agree with you.

I went on RAWK and it was 50/50 between whether it was a red or not.

fwiw imho it was. He deserved it for tucking his shirt in and wearing sandals and trackies for his photo op. Oh, and turning us down for them. Was Bernie Mandic involved?

Anyway, he should get an extra one game ban for a frivolous appeal but he won't because the FA will probably overturn it anyway.

Fuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuuck Offffffffffffff!!!!!!!!!