Will Potter be a success at Chelsea?

Originally Posted by Stickman

10th

looking good.

Clearly, he needs more time. 🤞

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Will be sacked before the end of the season.

Originally Posted by NedKelly

Revision - gone before the end of the season.

They look shocking. He won’t be afforded the time he had at Brighton.

Imagine if we’d actually gone for him instead of Erik, as a few on here wanted

Originally Posted by NedKelly

I said it the day he was appointed...

Sage....

Originally Posted by windy waffles

I said it the day he was appointed...

Sage....

Was a very brave call tbh. I mean who could’ve foreseen it, apart from everybody?

Originally Posted by NedKelly

Was a very brave call tbh. I mean who could’ve foreseen it, apart from everybody?

So why are you boasting about it?

Originally Posted by windy waffles

So why are you boasting about it?

Annoying, isn’t it?

Originally Posted by NedKelly

Annoying, isn’t it?

No.

Originally Posted by NedKelly

Annoying, isn’t it?

Knew he should have waited for the arsenal job to become available.

Originally Posted by windy waffles

No.

Originally Posted by AK14

Knew he should have waited for the arsenal job to become available.

Thought you was holding out for him to come here, pal:

https://www.utdforum.com/forum/poll....ts&pollid=2178

Originally Posted by NedKelly

Thought you was holding out for him to come here, pal:

https://www.utdforum.com/forum/poll....ts&pollid=2178

Would have taken him back then nqat, Pal.

Like Conte to Spurs this was a match made in hell, for very different reasons of course.

I can’t see Chelsea getting back to the top any time soon, the owner smacks of being a poor influence over their footballing operations.

Originally Posted by Stickman

Like Conte to Spurs this was a match made in hell, for very different reasons of course.

I can’t see Chelsea getting back to the top any time soon, the owner smacks of being a poor influence over their footballing operations.

They have spent £600m on quality players, they need a proper no.9 and someone who doesn’t play a back three of Koulibaly, James and Cucerella

They’ll be a nightmare next season imo - if they get Nagelsmann & have no Europe it’s a huge benefit with one game a week vs the likes of us playing 3 times.

Originally Posted by Baron

They have spent £600m on quality players, they need a proper no.9 and someone who doesn’t play a back three of Koulibaly, James and Cucerella

They’ll be a nightmare next season imo - if they get Nagelsmann & have no Europe it’s a huge benefit with one game a week vs the likes of us playing 3 times.

too many players at once imo. Need to phase in that type of turnover across more than one window.

Originally Posted by Stickman

too many players at once imo. Need to phase in that type of turnover across more than one window.

you mean like across the summer and winter window yeah?