FA Youth Cup - 2011

carlo's point is that it's hard to tell at youth level, and Chadwick was amazing at that level as well, whereas, say, Beckham wasn't. Not such an unreasonable argument.

Originally Posted by andyroo

carlo's point is that it's hard to tell at youth level, and Chadwick was amazing at that level as well, whereas, say, Beckham wasn't. Not such an unreasonable argument.

Maybe, but it's easy to spot a player who has exceptional ability like Morrison has. Lingard is good at this level but the difference between him and Morrison is vast.

Originally Posted by Rhodzy

Can't believe Ravvers is being compared to Chadwick. Ability wise he's streets ahead and it's not just because it's at youth level, imo he'd look comfortable the the 1st team right now. Only thing thats setting him back is his off the field issues and that's a big issue.

You're an idiot.

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

You're an idiot.

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

You're an idiot.

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

You're an idiot.

Cheers.

Originally Posted by Rhodzy

Cheers.

Theres a taste boys, now push on and get some proper trophies

Just to weigh in late on the Ravel lightweight debate, the way the game is now if he did get knocked over he'd get frees 80% of the time. Giggs wasn't exactly bulky when he came in. Personally I think he's got enough ability to make any physical disadvantages a minor inconvenience. The major inconvenience being his other well publicised issues obviously.

Originally Posted by RedMenace

Just to weigh in late on the Ravel lightweight debate, the way the game is now if he did get knocked over he'd get frees 80% of the time. Giggs wasn't exactly bulky when he came in. Personally I think he's got enough ability to make any physical disadvantages a minor inconvenience. The major inconvenience being his other well publicised issues obviously.

Nail. Head. On.

Look at Messi- (yes I know he's ridiculous and I'm not comparing them) he's a @#%&!ing dwarf!