Tevez busted...

Originally Posted by andyroo

It's not a first time offence.

It is however acceptable behaviour in Argenti.......zzzzzz.

Originally Posted by irk

by definition you have to have at least one previous conviction, but as far as I'm aware this is the first time he's driven while disqualified. that's what counts, rumpole.

Isn't being disqualified the one previous conviction?

Hope I'm not being thick here but, well...

Originally Posted by Scabs

Isn't being disqualified the one previous conviction?

Hope I'm not being thick here but, well...

don't worry. I'd like to get into law lecturing. obvs not to the remedial level you seem to require, but hey ho.

yes, he was disqualified as a punishment for other road traffic offences. speeding or failing to provide details or some such shit from memory. those are his previous offences, but anyone who is disqualified has to have at least one previous conviction or they couldn't have been disqualified could they?

he'll get another lengthy ban and a community punishment.

if he does it again after this, then he's in...ahem hot water

Originally Posted by irk

don't worry. I'd like to get into law lecturing. obvs not to the remedial level you seem to require, but hey ho.

yes, he was disqualified as a punishment for other road traffic offences. speeding or failing to provide details or some such shit from memory. those are his previous offences, but anyone who is disqualified has to have at least one previous conviction or they couldn't have been disqualified could they?

he'll get another lengthy ban and a community punishment.

if he does it again after this, then he's in...ahem hot water

That's £#%&!ing stupid.

Anyway, City have just released a statement saying that the club will serve his sentence if they can have his 12 points.

Mancini's offered to take the rap for him. He could do with the twelve points

Edit: %@#$&!s!

Originally Posted by jaffo

Mancini's offered to take the rap for him. He could do with the twelve points

nyer nyer!

Originally Posted by irk

Absent any aggravating features I'll post a picture of my arse if he goes to prison. Hell, I might even post one anyway.

Originally Posted by Scabs

That's £#%&!ing stupid.

Anyway, City have just released a statement saying that the club will serve his sentence if they can have his 12 points.

no, it's not. your joke is stupid because it's an endorsement and discretionary disqualification or 6 points.

:spod:

Originally Posted by irk

no, it's not. your joke is stupid because it's an endorsement and discretionary disqualification or 6 points.

:spod:

I'm gonna hug you the hug up you hugger.

Originally Posted by irk

don't worry. I'd like to get into law lecturing. obvs not to the remedial level you seem to require, but hey ho.

yes, he was disqualified as a punishment for other road traffic offences. speeding or failing to provide details or some such shit from memory. those are his previous offences, but anyone who is disqualified has to have at least one previous conviction or they couldn't have been disqualified could they?

he'll get another lengthy ban and a community punishment.

if he does it again after this, then he's in...ahem hot water

£#%&! me. Not much of a deterrent is it? Another ban for somebody who isn't £#%&!ed about being banned?

Originally Posted by Scabs

I'm gonna £#%&! you the £#%&! up you £#%&!.

1 Offence of sending letters etc. with intent to cause distress or anxiety.(1)Any person who sends to another person—
(a)a [F1letter, electronic communication or article of any description] which conveys—
(i)a message which is indecent or grossly offensive;
(ii)a threat; or
(iii)information which is false and known or believed to be false by the sender; or
(b)any [F2article or electronic communication] which is, in whole or part, of an indecent or grossly offensive nature,
is guilty of an offence if his purpose, or one of his purposes, in sending it is that it should, so far as falling within paragraph (a) or (b) above, cause distress or anxiety to the recipient or to any other person to whom he intends that it or its contents or nature should be communicated.
(2)A person is not guilty of an offence by virtue of subsection (1)(a)(ii) above if he shows—
(a)that the threat was used to reinforce a demand [F3made by him on reasonable grounds]; and
(b)that he believed [F4, and had reasonable grounds for believing,] that the use of the threat was a proper means of reinforcing the demand.
[F5(2A)In this section “electronic communication” includes—
(a)any oral or other communication by means of a telecommunication system (within the meaning of the Telecommunications Act 1984 (c. 12)); and
(b)any communication (however sent) that is in electronic form.]
(3)In this section references to sending include references to delivering [F6or transmitting] and to causing to be sent [F7, delivered or transmitted] and “sender” shall be construed accordingly.
(4)A person guilty of an offence under this section shall be liable on summary conviction to [F8imprisonment for a term not exceeding six months or to a fine not exceeding level 5 on the standard scale, or to both].

uh oh. bubbled.

Originally Posted by irk

uh oh. bubbled.

Shit.

It's a fair cop, see you in a couple of weeks then.


Edit: Edited.

Originally Posted by Scabs

Shit.

It's a fair cop, see you in a couple of weeks then.


Edit: Edited.

PM grinchy. he'll get you off yeah, like that, dirty bitch

Can he go in?

Originally Posted by irk

guideline for first time offence of dizzy driving is a community order. besides, he's too pretty for gaol.

Can be imprisonable tho.

Let's hope a DJ makes an example out of him.

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

Can be imprisonable tho.

Let's hope a DJ makes an example out of him.

Only if he goes rogue like a Turkish ref. Could happen. Doubt it though.

Originally Posted by irk

Only if he goes rogue like a Turkish ref. Could happen. Doubt it though.

If i was the DJ i'd send the @#%&!neck down tbf.

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

If i was the DJ i'd send the @#%&!neck down tbf.

you're hired.

macclesfield is a dodgy court... edit: (that's what you get for believe )

Originally Posted by Crumps

Jug of sugar and boiling water treatment.

what, again???

Originally Posted by £#%&! KFC

what, again???

the other side. doing him a favour. symmetry is beauty after all.