|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Dick. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Like I said I’m not saying this is the same - I don’t think Ole has the gonads Frogson had. (that we were yet to find out at the time) Quote:
There’s a team here somewhere- something will turn, leaving Fred on a 2nd half yellow won’t turn any keys though Squeaky bum time for Ole this team and the role the support plays |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
It makes for a more romantic story though. I do think that villareal could have been ole’s version of our 1990 cup win. To miss out on that will be looked at as a turning point - as I and many others pointed out on the night. Would have been better if he hadn’t directly contributed to our £#%&! up that night. But that loss is on him. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
He isn’t. He clearly isn’t. Fergie had done stuff to get the United job. “His first few years mirror Klopp” They don’t. Klopp always had a style and was one of the most sought after managers in Europe. He’s not a top coach and never will be, that’s fine. But using Ferguson as the constant ‘give him time’ template is just lazy. Most managers don’t get better with time in a job if they nosedive after 3 years. Fergie is the exception, not the rule. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
People are stuck in this Fergie vortex aren’t they. Anything happens at United - quick, consult the 1989 Ferguson Almanac. Ah yes, page 32 - this is what happens next. Everyone and everything has moved on, except United. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
currently holding Rangers 2-2 away... |