|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Now we can see how avram and joel would have to buy out their siblings, but it woulkd be of no cosequence to united these mother£#%&!ers would probably tie thier buying out to future united profits, which would actually be really smart |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Surprised they’ve not looked into the levers Barca spent all summer pulling as yet.. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
sends loads of caracters per finger press Quote:
it would be THEIR debt, on THEIR portfolio, tied to the probability of United generating dividends |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Would they not be able to move it onto the club in any way, as they did previous? However it works out, for the Glazer’s to remain in control somebody is taking on debt to sort this ownership thing out, and the club is seeing no money/investment, and is still looking for investment for stadium etc. which would end up being more debt. Not a good outcome for the club imo. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
and no, the individual agreements would be between them the galzers, although it could well be anchored by their asset portfolio of which united is a major asset |
|
||||
|
||||
So yeah, they’d basically be using United to secure more debt and then using United to service said debt in the form of dividends. The question would be the level of debt they’d need to take on to do it and the level of servicing required, as United are pretty stretched at the moment and are in need of investment.
I personally suspect they’re already up to their eyeballs in debt secured agains the club tbh. All of them. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I think they are up to their eyeballs in assets Its their assets that have all the debt you see? |
|
||||
|
||||
Yes. I’m saying monies for other assets secured against United, while on their personal portfolios. So an ailing mall, or whatever, propped up by a $200m loan taken out in their name with United as security. Or something along those lines. In a similar way to how you’ve described they would secure the money to buy out their siblings. I imagine United being their strongest asset in that sense.
However you chop it up, for them to remain, a shit ton more debt would have to be accrued and serviced, and United would not benefit in any way, shape or form. Quite the opposite. I £#%&!ing hope there’s a white knight/Unicorn bidder nobody knows about yet |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
they transferred their threat to their assets, which they borrowed money to purchase |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Quote:
If they have and they sell United would they have to them settle any debts where United were the asset they’d secured against or could they just move it to the Buccs, for instance? |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I give up |
|
||||
|
||||
I don't believe the Glazer's viewed United as anything other than a cash machine.
Given that they have pretty much cleaned out the club you've got to ask yourself why they would stay on now the easy money has been made. They are being offered a choice of £6bn or staying on a financially sinking ship. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
united would be fun to own look at you lot making their minds up for them |
Similar Threads for: The Glazer Reign Is Crumbling | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
This is the story of Ed Woodward's Man United reign - he knows he failed to deliver | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 06-01-2022 12:40 PM |
Timeline: Glazers and their turbulent reign at Manchester United | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 02-05-2021 07:00 PM |
Eric cautioned for Assault - When will his reign of terror end? | irk | Football | 39 | 14-03-2014 10:49 AM |
well, we're into the last 30 minutes or so of Big Freggleson's reign ! | Fountz | Football | 294 | 04-07-2013 07:24 AM |
4 Forwards from SAFs reign. | magic_cantona | Football | 90 | 14-12-2012 03:45 AM |