Erling Haaland

Originally Posted by Part 36 Offer

Yep. Would have been amazing for us but would have been super short term and Raiola would have made us look like mugs.

Originally Posted by est.1878

Well yeah, point taken

Originally Posted by AK14

So glad the owners saved money by not paying Raiola and stopped this guy from forcing an imaginary move to Liverpool in 2-3 years

You just don’t understand anything do you?

Pay your subs you tight @#%&!.

Apparently (The Athletic) the release clause is a lot higher than what’s been reported in the British press (woody briefing to save face?) and can only be activated near the end of his contract.

cant see anything other than this being a missed opportunity. given the state of the club right now, i think it was worth doing what was needed to get him in

i know everyone talks about deals not really getting done till the last day, but it always feels like a wasted month where a difference is made.

Line up one or two top signings for Jan 1, and be prepared to shell out to make them happen then perform during Jan while everyone else fights for the scraps

will be suprised if we get any forwards in the month at all.

Originally Posted by Splitty62

cant see anything other than this being a missed opportunity. given the state of the club right now, i think it was worth doing what was needed to get him in

i know everyone talks about deals not really getting done till the last day, but it always feels like a wasted month where a difference is made.

Line up one or two top signings for Jan 1, and be prepared to shell out to make them happen then perform during Jan while everyone else fights for the scraps

will be suprised if we get any forwards in the month at all.

well..... yeah.

we don't do the right things.

What a player this kid is.

Originally Posted by AK14

What a player this kid is.

7 goals in his first 3 appearances, first one to ever do that in German football. Also only had 7 ducking shots, scored with every single one ffs

Should have given him, his crippled old man and parasite of an agent everything they wanted..

Even if it did turn out to only be for a few years.

Dortmund should enjoy him while they have him. He'll be at Bayern soon.

He could do better than Bayern perhaps. Barca, Madrid and we also have to recognise that now £#%&!ing Liverpool is probably a step up from Bayern

£#%&!ing albino @#%&!.

Originally Posted by AK14

Should have given him, his crippled old man and parasite of an agent everything they wanted..

Even if it did turn out to only be for a few years.

obviously. just to put it in perspective, he would have cost about the same as james.

We showed Riola didn't we...

Stupid @#%&!s.

Farmers league.

£#%&! him and his fat shit of an agent

We’re one of the biggest clubs in the world, not a £#%&!ing incubator for good teams.

Originally Posted by utd99

We’re one of the biggest clubs in the world, not a £#%&!ing incubator for good teams.

We should have signed him..

If you think otherwise you're an idiot.

Originally Posted by windy waffles

We should have signed him..

If you think otherwise you're an idiot.

I’d explain, but you wouldn’t understand Koppas. Have some £#%&!ing pride man.

Originally Posted by utd99

We’re one of the biggest clubs in the world, not a £#%&!ing incubator for good teams.

No we're not. Not anymore

Originally Posted by utd99

I’d explain, but you wouldn’t understand Koppas. Have some £#%&!ing pride man.

With United atm?

No chance.

Originally Posted by utd99

We’re one of the biggest clubs in the world, not a £#%&!ing incubator for good teams.

let's say that's true for the sake of the discussion. he would have improved our team and we have some very decent players. we just need a handful more and by the time his buy-out kicked in, he might actually see united as the place to be.

but, even if he left after a few years, we would be much better than we are likely to be without him. if we had got haaland and fernandes at the beginning of the window, we'd be in fourth place and in a cup final.