United Forum
Go Back   United Forum > Manchester United > Football
Closed Thread
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 04:45 PM
jem
 
Default

gadaffi will be pleased.
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 04:48 PM
borsuk
 
Default

stoking the fires

a pissed-off fergie > any other kind of fergie
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 04:48 PM
Baron
 
Default

He's got til Tuesday to respond so he'll be at Anfield.
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 04:51 PM
Jack Duckworth
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by borsuk
stoking the fires

a pissed-off fergie > any other kind of fergie
definitely.

i love a bit of controversy to get the old siege mentality going again
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 05:28 PM
Lok
 
Default

Stupid. Just stupid.

Fair enough if he was picking on the ref for no good reason, but the ref was clearly a homer. Someone had to say it.
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 05:32 PM
MJ Ramone
 
Default

I wasn't expecting this
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 06:15 PM
Part 36 Offer
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jack Duckworth
definitely.

i love a bit of controversy to get the old siege mentality going again
oh yeah.

cheers for the pm btw you taxi @#%&!. thought you were sirl ffs tbhsirl
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 06:34 PM
Redordead
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Baron_van_Marlon


Mental.

As uninspiring as the side is, the defence is the best in Europe for a kick off.

Nani's possibly player of the season. Berbatov's the league's leading scorer. Everyone else in the side is a full international with a plethora of experience.

If you look at some of the shite that has won stuff in the last decade you'll excuse me for thinking Fergie's working with scraps.

As for the supposed ban, it wont happen.
You missed my point, the table says we are best we deserve to win agreed, however, if city was managed correctly or chelsea hadnt imploded or Arsenal had bought given/swarzcer(sp) and say samba ( point being 10 mill on experience) we wouldnt be top because for me this is the weakest side we have had in a good while, we have had better sides than this win nothing in the last twenty years.

We need new blood in my opinion bigtime, next season Chelsea arsenal and city will be stronger, Liverpool probably and god knows spurs hopefully weaker because we have signed a couple...
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 06:53 PM
Tumescent Throb
 
Default

every season people say next season everyone will be stronger and united will be weaker

and every season it turns out to be %@#$&!s and that the reason is that football is shitter than it was otherwise it would've happened, but mark my words next season everyone will be stronger and united will be weaker blah blah £#%&!etty £#%&!ing blah
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 07:18 PM
borsuk
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redordead
You missed my point, the table says we are best we deserve to win agreed, however, if city was managed correctly or chelsea hadnt imploded or Arsenal had bought given/swarzcer(sp) and say samba ( point being 10 mill on experience) we wouldnt be top because for me this is the weakest side we have had in a good while, we have had better sides than this win nothing in the last twenty years.

We need new blood in my opinion bigtime, next season Chelsea arsenal and city will be stronger, Liverpool probably and god knows spurs hopefully weaker because we have signed a couple...
£#%&!sakes. if if if if. what if rooney hadn't acted the @#%&! and had produced 40 goals again? what if valencia hadn't broke his leg? what if hargreaves had been able to play? a daft argument tbph.

if arsenal improved so would we, just as we did when wenger came and created/inherited his best arsenal side, just as we did when maureen raised the bar with chelsea. it's in the nature of competition and in the nature of ferguson.
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 08:19 PM
Redordead
 
Default

Christ can no one be objective on here?

The If was not known before the season started, city could have been managed correctly.

If we buy no one other than another £#%&!ing striker and a 17 year prospect we will win £#%&! all next season.

I want Scholes and Giggs to retire because as much as I love them, it is a cover to not buy in replacements, we either have the money and are not spending or we are skint and making do, neither to me is acceptable.

If anyone thinks we will win anything next year with no spending they are in a fantasy land.
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 08:29 PM
red in cumbria
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redordead
If anyone thinks we will win anything next year with no spending they are in a fantasy land
Is this an entry for straw man of the year competition??
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 08:38 PM
Redordead
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red in cumbria
Is this an entry for straw man of the year competition??
I am afraid you have me at a disadvantage
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 09:06 PM
Tumescent Throb
 
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by Redordead

I want Scholes and Giggs to retire because as much as I love them, it is a cover to not buy in replacements, we either have the money and are not spending or we are skint and making do, neither to me is acceptable.
and here was me thinking the reason they still get a game is because they are still two of the best players in the whole league

turns out it was just a cover to make up the numbers
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 09:07 PM
redmike
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ Ramone
I wasn't expecting this
Yep big shock
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 11:08 PM
thatsfuctit
 
Default

refusing to speak to MUTV now
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...utv-fa-charge?


what next - refusing to speak to Cathy?
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 11:15 PM
Tumescent Throb
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatsfuctit
refusing to speak to MUTV now
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...utv-fa-charge?


what next - refusing to speak to Cathy?
Quote:
and after viewing a copy of the video, the FA has decided there is sufficient reason to act.
presumably not the video of the match then
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 11:24 PM
red in cumbria
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by thatsfuctit
refusing to speak to MUTV now
http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2...utv-fa-charge?


what next - refusing to speak to Cathy?
Blanked MUTV before, hasn't he??
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 11:28 PM
andyroo
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red in cumbria
Blanked MUTV before, hasn't he??
Thought he did for a bit after the Keano business.
 
Unread 03-03-2011, 11:29 PM
thatsfuctit
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by red in cumbria
Blanked MUTV before, hasn't he??
yes - when some whippersnapper journo mentioned he preferred 442 over 451
Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Similar Threads for: Sir Alex Ferguson faces ban over comments made about referee
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Ravel Morrison faces familiar problem as Wayne Rooney emulates Sir Alex Ferguson fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 28-02-2023 05:40 PM
'I made a bad decision there' - the petrol station meeting that led to Sir Alex Ferguson's biggest M fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 18-12-2022 05:41 AM
David Beckham reveals how Sir Alex Ferguson once made him cry at Manchester United fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 05-11-2022 07:00 AM
Sir Alex Ferguson and Gary Neville's comments give Erik ten Hag a Man United conundrum fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 11-05-2022 10:40 AM
'They could have made me President that day!': Sir Alex Ferguson's best memory at Manchester United fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 28-03-2021 12:00 PM
All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 PM.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024 utdforum.com. This site is in no way affiliated to Manchester United Football Club.