|
||||
|
||||
No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
Tevez was £#%&!ing bang on. What's the point of signing for United if you play up front?
Ferguson is so obsessed with 4-5-1 that he'd rather play a £#%&!ing passenger up front than deviate away from his winning (sic) possession football (sic) system. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
You're desperate for somebody to 'bite' aren't you?
You've made this exact same point in about 40 different Threads. Rooney wasn't a passenger. He was excellent for 20minutes & helped get us into a 2-0 lead. He can't help it if he's £#%&!ing injured can he. It says more about Berbatov than any £#%&!er else. I think Fergie would have played Wazza in that protective £#%&!ing moonboot ahead of Berbatov tonight. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
We won 3-2 against the German champions, we were in the quarter finals and we're 2nd in the league, from playing 4-5-1. Plus its more of a 4-3-3 than a 4-5-1.
We lost tonight, lets not start getting on players/managers backs. |
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
Quote:
|
|
|||
|
|||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
we can't play 4-4-2 because we don't have the midfield for it, especially if the other team is playing 4-3-3 or 4-5-1.
Giggs - Keane - Scholes - Becks = great and might put up a fight against most 4-5-1s. But even against the best sides, if they played 4-5-1 we'd struggle. 4-3-3 covers up our midfield weaknesses and helps us cope better with other team's set ups. How many teams play 4-4-2 against us nowadays? Probably none. This seems to be the perfect system now. I wonder if football will ever evolve from everyone using this. I can't see it going back to 4-4-2 because this system just destroys it. the concept of strike partnerships is dead. Kinda shocking England still play it actually. We're the only top European side who even try to hang onto our 4-4-2 tradition. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
Quote:
but in reality we hit two early goals just through flying at them and then got a 3rd on half-time when it looked more likely that Bayern would score themselves. and then they did. rooney should've been hauled off the moment he started limping ffs. he was £#%&! all use after that anyway, as you say. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
4-5-1, or 4-3-3 (etc) can be as attacking and adventurous as you like. it's a question of intent. i'd have thought the contrast between the chelsea game and last night would have made that pretty obvious.
and berbatov didn't play because he has been poor, not because of some tactical inflexibility on fergie's part. |
|
||||
|
||||
Re: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so...
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
Similar Threads for: No value? Too right; 100k a week to sit on the bench? I don't think so... | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Crisis, what crisis? Sancho is set for £340,000-a-week, Maddison is being bumped up to £100k a wee | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 09-08-2020 11:00 AM |
play for united (well be on the bench) or play for a mid table team week in, week out on abit more £ | marlo | Football | 37 | 11-12-2010 07:19 PM |
Gareth Barry - 100k a week | Jack's Smirking Revenge | Football | 129 | 03-06-2009 04:18 PM |