The Glazer Reign Is Crumbling

Originally Posted by Ethers

3 paragraphs? A page of A4? What we talking here…

https://youtu.be/IkYUDQCYGHA

https://twitter.com/utdplug/status/1632128922748952584?s=46&t=bfVvPcxzFISmV5ixy0aAOQ

Originally Posted by dunk

https://twitter.com/utdplug/status/1...FISmV5ixy0aAOQ

We’ve decided to let you offer us more money.

“Bidders thought to be growing frustrated with the slow progress “. @#%&!s not even committed to attend OT meeting and sending Arnold and Raine representatives. The way they’ve done business since the first darkened our doors. Isolate the process through intermediaries and drag it out like nearly eve£#%&!ing transfer they’ve been involved with

Going old school. Acetate and OHP at the ready.

Originally Posted by Denis Irwell

“Bidders thought to be growing frustrated with the slow progress “. @#%&!s not even committed to attend OT meeting and sending Arnold and Raine representatives. The way they’ve done business since the first darkened our doors. Isolate the process through intermediaries and drag it out like nearly eve£#%&!ing transfer they’ve been involved with

They 're a bunch of @#%&!s. Fredsters trying to mount a case for them after we've just won the league cup and finally found a decent manager after years of ineptitude, mismanagement and theft from the club. gtfo

I didn't want these ownership models of big money but the blame lies squarely with the regulation of the game. The FA, PL and TV money all contributed to this situation.

Originally Posted by dunk

https://twitter.com/utdplug/status/1...FISmV5ixy0aAOQ

It’ll be an interesting development if this third ‘don’t really exist’ bidder turns out to have the nicest sentences in the second stage.

Originally Posted by Lodestar

They 're a bunch of @#%&!s. Fredsters trying to mount a case for them after we've just won the league cup and finally found a decent manager after years of ineptitude, mismanagement and theft from the club. gtfo

I didn't want these ownership models of big money but the blame lies squarely with the regulation of the game. The FA, PL and TV money all contributed to this situation.

Who's mounting a case for the glazers to stay ??

Absolutely nobody other than Drexl when he was on a mad one that night

That picture of Real Madrid’s stadium has put me in the mood for a toasted sarnie. I’m away to dig the breville out.

Originally Posted by Finport Red

That picture of Real Madrid’s stadium has put me in the mood for a toasted sarnie. I’m away to dig the breville out.

Ground beef toastie?

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Who's mounting a case for the glazers to stay ??

Have a look through the thread - some have said they prefer the Glazers than Qatar (which is the only game in town for a takeover).

The Qatari model is simple and understood - it's sportwashing in a better way than across town because we've got the fanbase and revenue streams.

The Ineos model is a concern because it explicitly says no new debt. The concern is how the debt will be dealt with - simply passed to Ineos to be paid down or will Ratcliffe and the Ineos board insist on United paying it down over time?

If we didn't have such a level of debt and infrastructure neglect then we'd be team Ineos all the way.

Thrown in this third unknown bid and MUST will be spewing about not knowing who it is and what the offer entails. If it involves the Glazers remaining at the club there will be riots.

Originally Posted by Lodestar

Have a look through the thread - some have said they prefer the Glazers than Qatar (which is the only game in town for a takeover).

https://www.utdforum.com/forum/showthread.php?t=327356

Hopefully that utter debacle yesterday will remove the scales off some peoples eyes. These leeches need to be hunted down and hounded out now.

Originally Posted by sweetleftfoot

Hopefully that utter debacle yesterday will remove the scales off some peoples eyes. These leeches need to be hunted down and hounded out now.

Not sure they had a lot to do with that second half.

Originally Posted by Lodestar

Have a look through the thread - some have said they prefer the Glazers than Qatar (which is the only game in town for a takeover).

Can you quote all these people please?

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Not sure they had a lot to do with that second half.

Other than the team we could afford to put out there…. and giving the choice to Woodward when we did have some funds.

Maybe Sanchez piano might have done a better second half shift

I bet they're on the phone this morning to Jim and Qatar... "about those offers we said were too low......."

https://twitter.com/utdplug/status/1633579600025464834?s=46&t=46osAsCMaSbh7vgQsN2lEQ

Whose plan?