|
||||
|
||||
Ji-Sung Park's rumoured new contract
Any footballing reasons anybody can discern for this? Has not progressed in 4 years at the club and is blocking the way of younger players who may be able to make it. He is consistently mediocre performer with minimal creative talent and goal threat... Its a lot of shirts at 65k a week....
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/sport/foo...ks-future.html |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Park should be on £10k week max which would still put him on half a million a year and he should think himself lucky at that aswell, that's over a £100k a fortnight less than he is on, which equate to about £1-2 off a seat across the ground. Multiply that by another 15-20 across the squad and that's £30-£40 less per seat per game... and suddenly football becomes far more affordable ! |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
If United could pay him £10K per week they would. It's supply and demand. Someone would always outbid us in contract negotiations and we'd end up with shit throughout the squad if the club stuck to their guns. We'd then fail to get into the to 4 which would mean losing the better players.
|
|
|||
|
|||
If the marketing people are to be believed, Park brings in more revenue for the club than Ronaldo (did) and Rooney combined due to his appeal as the number one sportsman in Asia.
On that basis, he could be the highest paid player at the club and still make a profit. I agree with the wages scenario. Cut out the huge pay and we could get in for free. It can be done - Sam Hamman said Wimbledon in the 90s was run so lean, that sponsorship and TV money paid for everything and he made all profits from the gate receipts, so he could afford to keep them low. |
|
||||
|
||||
I love the Ji-Sung Park threads.
As soon as his name is mentioned, all the usual suspects jump on board venting their outrage that someone so shit can play for United. It's just a shame sharath/berba is banned because as sure as night follows day, he'd be wishing serious injury on him as we speak. fwiw - Park is a good squad player. In my humble opinion of course. Definitely worth keeping. |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
But apparently being born in Asia & running about a lot, very infrequently effecting a game in a positive sense with a goal, a run, an assist constitutes £65k a £#%&!ing week. He's a good player, nowhere near great, nowhere near an integral part of this United side, he could be replaced in the same way Pip Neville or Nicky Butt were for example, a top professional but that is frankly obscene in my opinion. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
In my opinion he is dog shit but we cant get rid of him because we dont have anyone else. That's what annoys me so much. |
|
||||
|
||||
It makes me laugh, Tevez was lauded for what Park does, and let's be honest., Tevez only had a bit more of a goal threat, and you'd expect that considering Tevez was a striker. If Tevez got 1 on 1 with an opposition player did you fancy him to beat him and make something happen? Did you £#%&!. Tevez was slower than Park
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
I gave Tevez a bit of shit, but he still scored 34 in 2 seasons, in 99 games. Park has scored 12 in 125 games. Slightly different players, positions, output. Similar amounts of dodgy touches & ability to look like they're running in a strobe light. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
Similar Threads for: Ji-Sung Park's rumoured new contract | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Manchester United legend Ji-Sung Park takes on coaching role at Queens Park Rangers | fred tissue | Football Auto-Threads | 0 | 21-12-2021 11:40 AM |
Ji sung park | carrick_16 | Football | 40 | 01-10-2014 03:24 PM |
park ji sung | marlo | Football | 65 | 15-09-2010 02:13 PM |
Ji Sung Park | Fuzzy Dunlop | Football | 62 | 31-01-2008 05:17 PM |
Park Ji Sung | punk_football | Football | 21 | 06-07-2007 04:56 AM |