West Ham bid for Maguire

Wants his pay-off. Basically saying he's happy to be a @#%&! and an outcast unless he gets his money.

Either we pay and we're effectively selling him for 20 mil, or West Ham cough up the extra. Don't really care as long as he's gone.

he's trying to swing it that it wasnt about the 10m, £#%&! off @#%&!

Probably put a hold to other signings this....

Massive £#%&!ing Booooooos

Originally Posted by Patty_b

Wants his pay-off. Basically saying he's happy to be a @#%&! and an outcast unless he gets his money.

Either we pay and we're effectively selling him for 20 mil, or West Ham cough up the extra. Don't really care as long as he's gone.

Same as Jones, more interested in getting every last penny than he is playing

United don’t feel they could get a replacement in time for the right money and want the money available to go elsewhere so have opted not to pay him off, it would seem.

Todibo was quoted at €45-50m
Pavard, the cheaper option, €35-40m

By the time Maguire is sold and paid off we’d make a loss taking money away from the budget for midfield.

Originally Posted by dunk

United don’t feel they could get a replacement in time for the right money and want the money available to go elsewhere so have opted not to pay him off, it would seem.

Todibo was quoted at €45-50m
Pavard, the cheaper option, €35-40m

By the time Maguire is sold and paid off we’d make a loss taking money away from the budget for midfield.

https://youtu.be/OSlfttDnurw

Originally Posted by Ethers

Looks like he belongs in the 70's

The @#%&!.

That's put paid to Pavard or Poor Leno signing.

Any pay off for him would presumably had to have been paid up in a lump sum, whereas a transfer fee received would be over a number of years. Could it be that in terms of freeing up money right now, selling him but having to pay him off would actually not make any difference to what we’ve got available, in fact it might even put a dent in the cash we have right now?

Originally Posted by Ethers

Any pay off for him would presumably had to have been paid up in a lump sum, whereas a transfer fee received would be over a number of years. Could it be that in terms of freeing up money right now, selling him but having to pay him off would actually not make any difference to what we’ve got available, in fact it might even put a dent in the cash we have right now?

Basically, would cost us money to sell and replace him, without really getting the player we want. Money needs to go elsewhere.

Disappointing, but £#%&! the fat headed @#%&!. He won’t play.

What the £#%&! was Ten Hag doing putting him in the squad last night?

Originally Posted by Tuco

What the £#%&! was Ten Hag doing putting him in the squad last night?

What the hell does this have to do with anything ???

Originally Posted by Tuco

What the £#%&! was Ten Hag doing putting him in the squad last night?

Maybe he thought forcing him through 90 minutes of watching us close up might have changed his mind about staying.

Originally Posted by Tuco

What the £#%&! was Ten Hag doing putting him in the squad last night?

Can advertise as "100% clean sheet ratio this season!".

Originally Posted by Tuco

What the £#%&! was Ten Hag doing putting him in the squad last night?

Think he just wanted to insult him by bringing Lindelof on instead. Ritual humiliation of Maguire is absolutely fine by me and if he stays I genuinely hope it happens over and over again.

Originally Posted by NedKelly

Think he just wanted to insult him by bringing Lindelof on instead. Ritual humiliation of Maguire is absolutely fine by me and if he stays I genuinely hope it happens over and over again.

He should slowly ramp up the humiliation by bringing on a less & less talented/experienced player instead of Maguire until he brings on some kid from the youth team who's only been at OT for 2 weeks and Maguire just sits there on the bench crying.

Sake. Read the room Slab? What a #@&%!.