FIFA Technical Report on 2010 World Cup - in 15 points

http://www.zonalmarking.net/2010/09/...eport-summary/

nft

the death of 4-4-2 eh? yeah okay. apart from Uruguay. but they don't count because Forlan played as a split striker? yeah okay. and Bayern didn't really make the CL final last season, and anyway they don't use anything remotely resembling 4-4-2. and Ferguson never favours two up front either, and wouldn't dream of winning the CL two years ago with such tactics... 4-4-2 is a dead formation; dinosaurus etc

most of the successful sides played ahem 4-2-3-1. allowing for the fact that they tweaked it to suit the opposition or the players they had available. so that even when it might - just might - have resembled, ooh let's say 4-4-2 it was of course not 4-4-2 with split strikers and wide men pushed on at all, but actually the mystical 4-2-3-1. it certainly at no point was 4-5-1 either...

talking of getting in down the sides btw (point 6 i believe) i've been watching United for 35 years...

The report was on the world cup.

hth

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

the death of 4-4-2 eh? yeah okay. apart from Uruguay. but they don't count because Forlan played as a split striker? yeah okay. and Bayern didn't really make the CL final last season, and anyway they don't use anything remotely resembling 4-4-2. and Ferguson never favours two up front either, and wouldn't dream of winning the CL two years ago with such tactics... 4-4-2 is a dead formation; dinosaurus etc

most of the successful sides played ahem 4-2-3-1. allowing for the fact that they tweaked it to suit the opposition or the players they had available. so that even when it might - just might - have resembled, ooh let's say 4-4-2 it was of course not 4-4-2 with split strikers and wide men pushed on at all, but actually the mystical 4-2-3-1. it certainly at no point was 4-5-1 either...

talking of getting in down the sides btw (point 6 i believe) i've been watching United for 35 years...

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......

oh right sorry. so it's specific to those 4 weekds in 2010 and absolutely £#%&! all else. despite mentioning trends in international football and such like.

yeah okay.

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

the death of 4-4-2 eh? yeah okay. apart from Uruguay. but they don't count because Forlan played as a split striker? yeah okay. and Bayern didn't really make the CL final last season, and anyway they don't use anything remotely resembling 4-4-2. and Ferguson never favours two up front either, and wouldn't dream of winning the CL two years ago with such tactics... 4-4-2 is a dead formation; dinosaurus etc

most of the successful sides played ahem 4-2-3-1. allowing for the fact that they tweaked it to suit the opposition or the players they had available. so that even when it might - just might - have resembled, ooh let's say 4-4-2 it was of course not 4-4-2 with split strikers and wide men pushed on at all, but actually the mystical 4-2-3-1. it certainly at no point was 4-5-1 either...

talking of getting in down the sides btw (point 6 i believe) i've been watching United for 35 years...

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

the death of 4-4-2 eh? yeah okay. apart from Uruguay. but they don't count because Forlan played as a split striker? yeah okay. and Bayern didn't really make the CL final last season, and anyway they don't use anything remotely resembling 4-4-2. and Ferguson never favours two up front either, and wouldn't dream of winning the CL two years ago with such tactics... 4-4-2 is a dead formation; dinosaurus etc

most of the successful sides played ahem 4-2-3-1. allowing for the fact that they tweaked it to suit the opposition or the players they had available. so that even when it might - just might - have resembled, ooh let's say 4-4-2 it was of course not 4-4-2 with split strikers and wide men pushed on at all, but actually the mystical 4-2-3-1. it certainly at no point was 4-5-1 either...

talking of getting in down the sides btw (point 6 i believe) i've been watching United for 35 years...

i would like to apologise to the forum for questioning the absolute truth of the zonal marking site. i realise this behaviour is unacceptable.

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

i would like to apologise to the forum for questioning the absolute truth of the zonal marking site. i realise this behaviour is unacceptable.

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

i would like to apologise to the forum for questioning the absolute truth of the zonal marking site. i realise this behaviour is unacceptable.

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

the death of 4-4-2 eh? yeah okay. apart from Uruguay. but they don't count because Forlan played as a split striker? yeah okay. and Bayern didn't really make the CL final last season, and anyway they don't use anything remotely resembling 4-4-2. and Ferguson never favours two up front either, and wouldn't dream of winning the CL two years ago with such tactics... 4-4-2 is a dead formation; dinosaurus etc

most of the successful sides played ahem 4-2-3-1. allowing for the fact that they tweaked it to suit the opposition or the players they had available. so that even when it might - just might - have resembled, ooh let's say 4-4-2 it was of course not 4-4-2 with split strikers and wide men pushed on at all, but actually the mystical 4-2-3-1. it certainly at no point was 4-5-1 either...

talking of getting in down the sides btw (point 6 i believe) i've been watching United for 35 years...

yeah okay.

Originally Posted by Zorg

yeah okay.

yeah okay

toilet gobshite 94

Originally Posted by Fuzzy Dunlop

zzzzzzzzzzzzzzzz......

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

toilet gobshite 94

I beg to differ. If you were throwing the punches, it'd look something like this.

Originally Posted by Spiffy

I beg to differ. If you were throwing the punches, it'd look something like this.

He'd also been shouting "Rooney out to in!""