Sam Ashton

Originally Posted by The Real Roxanne

well its just a point ......... i can only support one team

Originally Posted by puressence

never been fc and never will

Agreed.

I just don't how how I could cheer goals for a team I don't support.

Originally Posted by MUFC One Love

Agreed.

I just don't how how I could cheer goals for a team I don't support.

come and watch the crown

Originally Posted by puressence

come and watch the crown

That's the thing Lee, I'd be more interested in The Crown or any pub team if I knew somebody had something to do with them etc.

Originally Posted by waynes ear's

£#%&! tatty

you keep taking the piss since i made a joke about FC selling DVD's for every game and i've never kicked off until now

i will say this and hear it loud and clear

i was all for FC and went to a load of games home and away. I decided it was not for me. What i dont want is @#%&!s saying " your a £#%&!ing stooge" for going to wigan away last season.

what i also dont want is people like yourself trying to shoot me down when i point out that the club "set up for the fans" is also ripping off the fans wth dvd's/scarfs etc etc etc

andy walsh has 2 jobs? both paid
need i go on?

Thats isnt true FACT

Originally Posted by puressence

never been fc and never will

That should put at least 10% on the next attendance.

The vast majority of FC going United supporters (me included) fully respect any United fan's decision to support any United team the way they want to. Whether it be to go to OT, just do away games, support the reserves or do any combination including watching FC from time to time. We're all United supporters at the end of the day.

Nobody has called me a stooge for doing a United Euro away this season and why should they? If someone has behind my back I'd just have a quiet, erm, word in his/her shell-like.

What does piss me off are people who get called a stooge then become one. Posting libellous nonsense on here helps nobody, least of all the prat who posted it.

Carry on...

waynes starts off being well-disposed towards a club; but then one of its supporters insults him, and he hears and unquestioningly believes a story that the club is ripping off its fans and overpaying its administrators.



So, just one question: if that's enough to put him off, why he is still a United fan?

Originally Posted by waynes ear's

all of FC's board are earning money from supporters/sponsors

One of the board members is from Essex. She's been to, in total, some 10 official meetings (including board meetings - she's also heading up our football committee) since being voted in in October. She doesn't even claim for travel.

All board members have season tickets to Gigg Lane. STs that they've paid for. I'm assuming that the ones that are also sponsors (I can think of two, off hand) will be able to use one of the two STs that comes with being a sponsor as theirs, but it wouldn't surprise me if they've bought an additional one. They're that kind of people. I believe that, and I think, so do you (deep down).

Anyway, the said board member has advised me she'll sue you for libel. She asked me to say that, our board members don't comment on message boards (on issues regarding FCUM). Unfortunately, I don't think she was entirely serious. I think she should, just so people could see how foundationless this vendetta is.

Originally Posted by waynes ear's

andy walsh has 2 jobs? both paid

need i go on?

Please do! Members of FCUM would be very interested in knowing how Walsh and his cronies are milking us for funds, I'm sure.

Originally Posted by waynes ear's

i will stand by what i say on here 120% to me FC is a joke after actually learning about the previous

I think you should take a hard look at who's word you take for gospel. You're doing somebody else's dirty work here, Waynes. They're taking the piss, not out of FC, but you. Your 'source', clearly, isn't prepared to put these accusations up online, why do you think that is? They know it's a pack of lies, and want somebody else to do the shit-stirring for them.

***register henman***

FC have gone back on many of the principles that they were applauded for.

Originally Posted by Carrick

FC have gone back on many of the principles that they were applauded for.

like?


I don't follow fc at all but you may as well give examples

Originally Posted by chorleyred

like?


I don't follow fc at all but you may as well give examples

nor do I - but it seems to be the generalisations of the 'anti-fc' crowd which make not sympathise them.

'they've gone back on principles', 'they're anti-mufc', 'there's loads of corruption in the board' ... it all just seems like a crock of shite, that someones just made up on the net...

just complete overstatements with no hint of reliability. Whilst United 'supporters' moan about FC and their treatment of MUFC, I'm suprised FC followers haven't had enough of the amount of shit they get.

Originally Posted by Carrick

FC have gone back on many of the principles that they were applauded for.

Such as?

oh and another thing...

the term 'turncoat' is horrible and used too liberally.

"FC supporters are 'turncoats'" - save that for some @#%&! who truely deserves it - ie a united supporter who starts to support chelsea, or city, or as some of OT probably is...support their local team as well as United! That's a £#%&!ing turncoat.

The idea that anybody would be involved in Non League football to make money is a little ridiculous. Even with the decent gates FC gets, and with a ground share, I would expect it's a cash drain.

Originally Posted by Carrick

FC have gone back on many of the principles that they were applauded for.

Originally Posted by chorleyred

like?


I don't follow fc at all but you may as well give examples

Originally Posted by Riverside

Such as?

going to answer those questions?



Or just lob in the accusation, then crawl away and hide? You're still online, I see.



You must have had something in mind when you posted that. Please do tell us what it was, and what evidence you have for it.

Whilst we're ascribing principles based on dust, anyone fancy lobbing in a "i thought ft was started to get away from all this?'

I thought ft was started to get away from all this?

Er, can anyone explain the original post to me? The reference to Sam Ashton reading the Sun? Despite four pages of complete bullshit I still don't get it