Daley Blind...

Was a failure/was not a failure at United.

You decide!

Remains one of our best signings since Ferguson left. He was a versatile player with a great range of passing. Loved his attitude and wanted him to stay. Could provide cover in several positions.

Top red.

Is there an in between*?


*I know there isn't, but there should be tbh

Thought we were getting him in on loan then...

Should never have been sold.

should have added some context... reason for the thread is he was brought up on the Donny thread where one poster (won't mention Lok's name as don't want to shame him) said this...

The problem with Van Der Beek is that he's shit. A bit like Blind, he came, he failed and he left. Both were apparently very 'technical' players, yet 9 times out of 10 you wouldn't notice they're even on the pitch.

He was shit, that's why we ditched him despite us being desperate for decent defenders. We were lucky that Ajax would have him back.

Originally Posted by Gypsum Fantastic

should have added some context... reason for the thread is he was brought up on the Donny thread where one poster (won't mention Lok's name as don't want to shame him) said this...

Don’t forget this part -

He was a bit like Harry Magure except without any physicality whatsoever.

Who changed my vote???

In what way was he a success? He was shit so we sold him. The only club who would take him play in the Dutch league.

https://youtu.be/LefhFfR2NH8?si=NF9gzAbI0ToEglpX

Sooooooo technically gifted

I would genuinely rather have Maguire. He's equally clueless but at least he has a bit of strength.

I bet the people voting positively for him also thought Larsson was good for us football purists

https://youtube.com/shorts/g25QXOMCrrw?si=jdGH2A4bgzNDC-DZ

He was shite for us, we couldn’t get rid of him quick enough. £#%&! knows what he’s done elsewhere because I’d watched enough of him for us.

Originally Posted by Lok

I would genuinely rather have Maguire. He's equally clueless but at least he has a bit of strength.

https://youtube.com/shorts/yVDQBtEbC14?si=txps8OM0S535fLXB

Was decent.

https://youtube.com/shorts/8bbMJmEgoSk?feature=shared

He had nice hair though to be fair.

Originally Posted by AK14

Was decent.

Basically this....

Didn't pull up trees but was a solid pro and a useful addition to the side.

Certainly not a 'failure', whatever your definition of the word. Unless you're using Lok's dictionary.

It's close!

He was decent. Like May, Smalling or Varane.

Originally Posted by Gypsum Fantastic

It's close!

Classic Look, could write his football opinions on a postage stamp and they'd still be wrong ..

Good lad apparently though...

Neither of those options seem to cover it.

There should be an option for 'wasn't a complete failure but was slow and therefore relatively shit'.

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

Classic Look, could write his football opinions on a postage stamp and they'd still be wrong ..

Good lad apparently though...

Classic Buunks, could write all of his football opinions across the great wall of China and still they'd all be wrong.

Good lad apparently though....

Originally Posted by Lok

Classic Buunks, could write all of his football opinions across the great wall of China and still they'd all be wrong.

Good lad apparently though....

Need a bigger wall....

19-0.

#CoachesKnow

If he was a success surely he’d still be here?