United Forum
Go Back   United Forum > Manchester United > Football
Closed Thread
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 10:51 AM
AK14
 
Default


 
Unread 18-06-2019, 10:52 AM
Whip Hubley
 
Default

the nerve


still, we are thick as £#%&! so I'd try it if I were them
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 11:08 AM
puressence
 
Default

martials level tbh
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:21 PM
ScarFace
 
Default

LOLLLLL
Players need to start asking for realistic buyout prices, like A Madrid players seem to always do.

 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:22 PM
waynes ear's
 
Default

60 million and that £#%&!ing @#%&! Martial will sort it
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:28 PM
Patty_b
 
Default

We're £#%&!ed. Years of Ed bending himself over a table for anyone with an instagram account has completely ruined us.

Real Madrid picked up Hazard from a team who won the Europa League and can't sign any £#%&!ing replacements for £88.5 million, but West Ham will gladly hold Ed's balls over the fire for £75 million for an OK defender with potential.

£#%&!ed.
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:35 PM
AK14
 
Default

Signed him for 22m last summer...

 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:39 PM
Sparky***
 
Default

How are City able to go around and spend no more than £60m on any player and yet we seem to have to pay superstar money for palace players and West Ham players
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:41 PM
Curtis
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky***
How are City able to go around and spend no more than £60m on any player and yet we seem to have to pay superstar money for palace players and West Ham players
City backdoor money to people left right and centre.
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:42 PM
AK14
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky***
How are City able to go around and spend no more than £60m on any player and yet we seem to have to pay superstar money for palace players and West Ham players
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:45 PM
ScarFace
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky***
How are City able to go around and spend no more than £60m on any player and yet we seem to have to pay superstar money for palace players and West Ham players
Because they overpay but only 60mil is on paper. They'll give the club over the top money via another way ( see that turd defender they got a few years ago )
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 02:50 PM
waynes ear's
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky***
How are City able to go around and spend no more than £60m on any player
because other money off the books changes hands

£#%&! me
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 04:44 PM
andyroo
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky***
How are City able to go around and spend no more than £60m on any player and yet we seem to have to pay superstar money for palace players and West Ham players
What did Mahrez cost them? Or that goalkeeper?

They can afford to miss a target or two as well.

Also what Akkers said.
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 08:06 PM
Cream
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynes ear's
because other money off the books changes hands

£#%&! me
A serious accusation.

One you're willing to stand by in a court of law?
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 08:07 PM
waynes ear's
 
Default

Yeah. Me and scar will windmill the jury
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 08:43 PM
sa7
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cream
A serious accusation.

One you're willing to stand by in a court of law?
£#%&!ing UEFA are too shit scared to take City on.

However given that I’m sure Scar and Ears have more backbone than all of those @#%&! Euro@#%&!s combined I wouldn’t bet against them.
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 10:16 PM
windy waffles
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynes ear's
Yeah. Me and scar will windmill the jury
Only thing you will be windmilling is your winky, pal.
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 10:22 PM
Sparky***
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by andyroo
What did Mahrez cost them? Or that goalkeeper?

They can afford to miss a target or two as well.

Also what Akkers said.
Mahrez cost £60m and is their record signing.

Ederson cost £38m I think.

Like i said, for a club that is widely acknowledged to have a bottomless pit of cash behind them, it's astounding how they seem to be able to get away with relatively (by today's standards) sensible transfer fees.
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 10:27 PM
windy waffles
 
Thumbs down

Quote:
Originally Posted by Sparky***
Mahrez cost £60m and is their record signing.

Ederson cost £38m I think.

Like i said, for a club that is widely acknowledged to have a bottomless pit of cash behind them, it's astounding how they seem to be able to get away with relatively (by today's standards) sensible transfer fees.
Maybe they just go about buying players the right way?

They also don't go out and, generally, sign ready made world class players to be fair to them. They identity a target who is the right age and pay what the clubs want.

Totally opposite to what we do. Woodward has also probably pissed off 95% of Europe's clubs with his tactics, too.
 
Unread 18-06-2019, 10:28 PM
92ToBury
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by waynes ear's
because other money off the books changes hands

£#%&! me
This. Bent as £#%&!
Closed Thread
Thread Tools
Similar Threads for: Diop
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
New concussion substitute rule is slammed by brain injury charity Headway after Issa Diop injury fred tissue Football Auto-Threads 0 10-02-2021 03:00 PM
All times are GMT +1. The time now is 11:15 AM.
Copyright ©2006 - 2024 utdforum.com. This site is in no way affiliated to Manchester United Football Club.