Are we really about to sell the only player capable of bagging 20 and not replace him?

So the answer to the thread title is, it appears, YES.

What a surprise

Originally Posted by marlo

no its because we are affording time to someone who is clearly not good enough and never will be.

his footballing ancestor and his career should be a lesson to us all.

always not he brink of being top class, just a head down and run merchant who can just @#%&! the ball but not much else.
single digit league goals his whole career.

rAshford is a modern day Theo Walcott.


agendas aside...

name the attributes that indicate we have a real player on our hands. he is 22 in a few months so just leaving the wondered years but what did he show in those years ?

10 last season.

Ethers, that bet is off pal

deadly

https://twitter.com/Inter/status/1160569498128310272

The inter fans I know are absolutely buzzing

Originally Posted by TheFatGoth

The inter fans I know are absolutely buzzing

Lots of them in Geordieland, no?

Originally Posted by armchair

deadly

https://twitter.com/Inter/status/1160569498128310272

What a strange game that looked

Originally Posted by TheFatGoth

The inter fans I know are absolutely buzzing

Mario down the local pizza shop?

Not replacing his goals was a huge mistake.

Originally Posted by Switching Off

Not replacing his goals was a huge mistake.

We are relying on our remaining forwards to fill the gap. That may indeed have been over-optimistic

And the answer was: Yes.

Originally Posted by Vedder

Ethers, that bet is off pal

Back on pal. Both of them are £#%&!ing shit 👍🏻

Noticed Ole has started making a few comments about us not replacing him already...

Was pointless freezing him out of the squad and then selling him if we weren’t going to replace his output.

Originally Posted by AK14

Noticed Ole has started making a few comments about us not replacing him already...

Was pointless freezing him out of the squad and then selling him if we weren’t going to replace his output.

The alternative would have been to keep him and carry on playing him. In what universe was that ever going to be the answer?

Originally Posted by utd99

The alternative would have been to keep him and carry on playing him. In what universe was that ever going to be the answer?

The alternative was signing a replacement...

But if it meant keeping him for another season if we knew we wouldn’t be signing a replacement this summer, then I’d have picked that option over what we’ve done tbh.

We don’t score goals and he’s a player that..... scores goals.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

I'm sure Rashford's 12 goals will be more than enough for us to scrape into 8th

Looking good so far...

Originally Posted by AK14

The alternative was signing a replacement...

But if it meant keeping him for another season if we knew we wouldn’t be signing a replacement this summer, then I’d have picked that option over what we’ve done tbh.

We don’t score goals and he’s a player that..... scores goals.

He scored two more than Rashford last season.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

He scored two more than Rashford last season.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

He scored two more than Rashford last season.

That's why we lost faith in him, the goals dried up. And he has never been that much use apart from goals.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

He scored two more than Rashford last season.

Whilst being utter utter garbage; which is why he's no longer here.