Quote:
Originally Posted by 92ToBury
6 months down the line, no ST renewals, boycotts of sponsors successful, etc. Who could take their place that you'd be happy with?
Obviously we want them out and anyone who doesn't take money out of the club is better, but who do we realistically expect has the money to take us on? Let's face it, the 50+1 is a pipe dream, given how hard it would be to raise the cash for that level of fan ownership, especially if the lack of enthusiasm to invest 16 years was anything to go by.
|
anyone could own us if the price is driven down. fans could own 100%. it's not about raising money, it's about making the cost what we can afford. if people aren't prepared to sacrifice something, the glazers will just sit tight.