Luke shaw £#%&!ed

we should play wan b at left back and hope the opposition has a left-footed right wing.

This happened last season where it was like domino £#%&!ing rally. Here we are again trying to fit square pegs into round holes. In some cases, we've not even got the square pegs.

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

This happened last season where it was like domino £#%&!ing rally. Here we are again trying to fit square pegs into round holes. In some cases, we've not even got the square pegs.

We are cursed at this stage. Just when we look like we are building a foundation injuries come in .

Probably will be dalot at LB till malacia comes back. Might not be the worst decision in the world. ESP if he wants to continue pushing the full backs into CM.

Hardly recognise Elanga with the beard.

Is Mendy available?

Originally Posted by marlo

the glazers.

whatever you don't blame the manager.

the same manager that a puff piece in the athletic was written about all the changes he made and how serious he is about training..

this summer we cut a lot of commercial activities in America and replaced them with training sessions.
we are now getting injuries and also the team don't even look fit or prepared but this is NOT on the manager. definately not.


whatever, just definitely not the manager. apparently.

Look overtrained if anything. Keane said same thing after spurs.

Worst #@&%! film ever.

Didn't Evans used to do a bit of left back...

Erik’s fault

Get Sol Campbell in

It's no great loss. He needed dropping again anyway. Awful first 2 games.

imagine how fat he's gonna be on his first game back

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

It's no great loss. He needed dropping again anyway. Awful first 2 games.

leaving aside this being shite, even if we accept this as a legitimate opinion... who the £#%&! are you playing at lb instead of shaw?

Originally Posted by jem

leaving aside this being shite, even if we accept this as a legitimate opinion... who the £#%&! are you playing at lb instead of shaw?

Is there any need for this foul language?

I'd say Dalot but i'd drop Bissaka and play Dalot right back and Fernandez left back if Malacia is out.

Shaw and AWB have played a big part in our shambolic start to the season. I'd expect us to be 50-56% more cohesive immediately without these two #@&%!s trying to invert.

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

Is there any need for this foul language?

I'd say Dalot but i'd drop Bissaka and play Dalot right back and Fernandez left back if Malacia is out.

Shaw and AWB have played a big part in our shambolic start to the season. I'd expect us to be 50-56% more cohesive immediately without these two #@&%!s trying to invert.

is there any need for this foul language?

so, basically, you'd like to play malacia. and, as he's injured, fernandez.

ffs. malacia is little bag of £#%&! and fernandez hasn't done anything (looks good pushing forward, though).

maybe just let shaw play his game and 10h needs to stop trying to be clever. shaw has made blocks and clearing headers in both games. against spurs, maybe the reason someone was wide open on the touchline is because of where he was asked to play and the winger not covering back?

whatever criticism, fair or otherwise, that can be levelled at shaw, it comes down to this: do we have a better option at lb? the answer is an unequivocal no. as you're about to find out.

Originally Posted by est.1878

Worst #@&%! film ever.

Didn't Evans used to do a bit of left back...

Yes but bearing in mind he is pushing 43 probably best not to play him there.

Originally Posted by puressence

The new Arsenal dr working wonders

https://x.com/mo_utdred/status/1694819390058025026?s=46&t=GmThxTwvA3dB-7-ot5Dfuw

Originally Posted by jem

is there any need for this foul language?

so, basically, you'd like to play malacia. and, as he's injured, fernandez.

ffs. malacia is little bag of £#%&! and fernandez hasn't done anything (looks good pushing forward, though).

maybe just let shaw play his game and 10h needs to stop trying to be clever. shaw has made blocks and clearing headers in both games. against spurs, maybe the reason someone was wide open on the touchline is because of where he was asked to play and the winger not covering back?

whatever criticism, fair or otherwise, that can be levelled at shaw, it comes down to this: do we have a better option at lb? the answer is an unequivocal no. as you're about to find out.

It's not foul language. It's a derogatory term often applied to those of low intellect.

Not the same thing.

he'll just do eriksen for mount and dalot for Shaw.

Originally Posted by atticusgrinch

Is there any need for this foul language?

I'd say Dalot but i'd drop Bissaka and play Dalot right back and Fernandez left back if Malacia is out.

Shaw and AWB have played a big part in our shambolic start to the season. I'd expect us to be 50-56% more cohesive immediately without these two #@&%!s trying to invert.

I find it amusing you denigrate our 2 best full backs yet are constantly championing the average halfwit that is Dalot.

Worst than they first thought, apparently 👍

It's times like this where I really miss John O'Shea