Quote:
Originally Posted by dunk
Yep. He's limited, but he was our best player last night. What does that say about the rest of them.
|
he wasn't our best player. but what it says about the rest of them is they don't look so good when our game plan revolves around a useless £#%&!ing lump who just waves his arms around and jumps into people and underhits passes. best player, my £#%&!ing arse.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tiberian
Absolutely, Sold the wrong players, kept the wrong players, bought the wrong players. People were so quick to praise him for dumping the deadwood that they ignored the good and useful players being jettisoned along with them.
I was excited by the possibility of LVG, I wanted to see how a coach of his standing would bring the best out of the likes of Welbeck, Rafael, Nani, Jones, Smalling, Evans, not world class players but people who had been around and contributed to successful teams and understood the mentality and personality needed at this level.
|
evans was an absolute £#%&!ing @#%&!.
Quote:
Originally Posted by utd99
Problem is, the only people who can sack him now are even more clueless than him. And all they see are dollar signs. They will let their little cash register messiah run the football side into the ground rather than risk killing the golden goose.
|
this. owned and run by people who know £#%&! all about football. and there are no surprises there. the glazers are the real enemy.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb
what i don't get is why he cleared the path to the 1st team but then didn't allow pereira, januzaj and wilson the chance to make the step up that he's subsequently offered to lingard.
|
pereira has actually played well every time he's come on. all there is to get is that king louis is #@&%!ed. there are plenty of youngsters he has given a shot to and they seem to have fallen out of favour after one game or one bad pass. (hello, tyler...)
Quote:
Originally Posted by andyroo
Well not the one who rushes £#%&!ing Fellaini back for a trip to our hated rivals anyway.
What a @#%&! move that was.
|
yup. even if he hadn't rushed him.
Quote:
Originally Posted by S/Side.Red
Well my point was more that when the group is so limited it's hard to know what the best is. I looked at that side last night and it was an average CB pairing, a woefully average midfield pairing and three kids playing in attack ahead of a midget. Maybe they're performing below their potential, but I'm not sure. If so not by much.
LvG actually made very good changes at the break which got us back into the game.
|
it is £#%&!ing obvious our best is not the team with which he started. and he didn't have to start like that. good changes? bringing carrick on, when carrick should have £#%&!ing started (in midfield)? when are you just going to admit that he is one massive £#%&!ing idiot? oh, he's made some mistakes and he's had some bad luck? no. he is a £#%&!ing idiot who makes the same £#%&!ing mistakes over and over.
Quote:
Originally Posted by S/Side.Red
Liverpool aren't good enough that beating them 2-0 is impossible. We just put three past Arsenal.
|
this, however, is still true. if he puts out a better team and we score early, liverpool could totally fold into themselves and klopp will foam at the mouth. we have to put out a £#%&!ing midfield, though. and he cannot start with all of memphis, rashford and martial and no attackers on the bench.