Mason Greenwood

Originally Posted by Ethers

“Alleged victim”

What’s that now?

think he's refering to MNIH, who received some bad rep

Originally Posted by dunk

He can play wherever he likes, just not at United. If no other club in England will give him a go, he’s paying the price for his actions

What an absurd statement. So you can be ill-perceived at United but not elsewhere

Are you mad, fam?

Originally Posted by Ethers

Hope you’re getting over your ordeal pal.


“Alleged victim”

What’s that now?

I don't remember Jem being this much of a #@&%!. £#%&! knows what's happened to him.

"Alleged" ffs

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

I don't remember Jem being this much of a #@&%!. £#%&! knows what's happened to him.

"Alleged" ffs

Mate if anyone knows the value of a second chance it's you...#panini

Originally Posted by pedr0

think he's refering to MNIH, who received some bad rep

One could argue I’m the biggest victim in all of this

Well we got there in the end to the right decision

Mason has to go to a different country.

Time heals all wounds and I honestly wish him and his young family well. Why wouldn’t I?

United take the financial hit

United on the pitch lose a potentially great player

I just hope that the Moral Police now don’t give up and apply this moral standard all across the board.

Originally Posted by My Name is Heath

One could argue I’m the biggest victim in all of this

Well we got there in the end to the right decision

Mason has to go to a different country.

Time heals all wounds and I honestly wish him and his young family well. Why wouldn’t I?

United take the financial hit

United on the pitch lose a potentially great player

I just hope that the Moral Police now don’t give up and apply this moral standard all across the board.

Indeed. Likelihood of that being circa 0.077%

Is not beating, abusing and forcing your missus to have sex with you really that much of a moral standard?!

Feels like pretty much the bare minimum tbh.

I think you need to look up the meaning of circa.

Originally Posted by BigJim

I think you need to look up the meaning of circa.

Originally Posted by BigJim

I think you need to look up the meaning of circa.

Why Jim? Praytell?

Originally Posted by Ethers

Is not beating, abusing and forcing your missus to have sex with you really that much of a moral standard?!

Feels like pretty much the bare minimum tbh.

What has happened to you fam?! did he do any of those things?!

i hope mason and his family are doing ok through all of this hysteria as it can't be easy being the focal point of this witch-hunt, particularly with the way utd have handled it which has surely only added more stress. it seems to me they were finally getting their lives back on track; the joy and relief they must have felt at receiving the news utd were bringing him back, only to have those dreams cruelly taken away from them overnight, all because of rachel riley.

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

I don't remember Jem being this much of a #@&%!. £#%&! knows what's happened to him.

"Alleged" ffs

is use of the term alleged victim evil now?

maybe read what I actually wrote about his behaviour. or don't.

Originally Posted by Offerington

Why Jim? Praytell?



What has happened to you fam?! did he do any of those things?!

Yes

Are you saying she somehow faked everything?

Originally Posted by larry

i hope mason and his family are doing ok through all of this hysteria as it can't be easy being the focal point of this witch-hunt, particularly with the way utd have handled it which has surely only added more stress. it seems to me they were finally getting their lives back on track; the joy and relief they must have felt at receiving the news utd were bringing him back, only to have those dreams cruelly taken away from them overnight, all because of rachel riley.

preach bruv. Spot on, cuz

Originally Posted by Offerington

Indeed. Likelihood of that being circa 0.077%

Depends if it is a BAD offence

People on here brag about stealing

Newcastle’s owners have blood on their hands

Wear a suit and kill Yemenis? Fine if you’re rich.

Be a 19 year scumbag screaming at his girlfriend? Dead meat.

We all have different morals. Merely pointing that out will get the halfwits thinking I support XYZ.

Originally Posted by jem

is use of the term alleged victim evil now?

maybe read what I actually wrote about his behaviour. or don't.

Not evil, no. £#%&!ing stupid, disingenuous and crass, yes.

She's an 'alleged' victim if there's doubt that anything bad has happened to her. Is that the case, Jem?

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

Not evil, no. £#%&!ing stupid, disingenuous and crass, yes.

She's an 'alleged' victim if there's doubt that anything bad has happened to her. Is that the case, Jem?

Just to be clear - do we know what happened?

I heard the tapes last year but don’t particularly want to listen to them again

I honestly don’t know what happened in the end

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

Not evil, no. £#%&!ing stupid, disingenuous and crass, yes.

She's an 'alleged' victim if there's doubt that anything bad has happened to her. Is that the case, Jem?

you've fallen for ethers's pathetic and obvious distraction. last night I said he was guilty and got told off. today, I am getting told off for using the word alleged. the conclusion is that some people are just being dicks (although I don't mind the legal eagle).

in the meantime, I note that ethers has thrown that shiny grenade and avoided addressing the point. which is that he only worries about the victim when and to the extent that it is convenient for his argument. fact is, she is a victim twice over. firstly, of his unwelcome advances (greenwood's, for clarity). and now she's impaled on the pitchfork of righteous indignation. £#%&! her, though, there's a principle at stake.

he deserves what he gets. does she?

Originally Posted by jem

you've fallen for ethers's pathetic and obvious distraction. last night I said he was guilty and got told off. today, I am getting told off for using the word alleged. the conclusion is that some people are just being dicks (although I don't mind the legal eagle).

in the meantime, I note that ethers has thrown that shiny grenade and avoided addressing the point. which is that he only worries about the victim when and to the extent that it is convenient for his argument. fact is, she is a victim twice over. firstly, of his unwelcome advances (greenwood's, for clarity). and now she's impaled on the pitchfork of righteous indignation. £#%&! her, though, there's a principle at stake.

he deserves what he gets. does she?

Hang on, she deserves what she gets for what? For putting it all out there? What is it you're expecting to happen to her for telling everyone what a @#%&! Greenwood is?

Originally Posted by magic_cantona

Hang on, she deserves what she gets for what? For putting it all out there? What is it you're expecting to happen to her for telling everyone what a @#%&! Greenwood is?

wow. victim blaming. nice one.

it's lucky you're on the side of truth and justice, buddy.