Rasmus Hojlund?

Originally Posted by believe

Just got playing after his injury , deal will have been done not to overplay him. It’s pretty straightforward.

This is the third game back after his debut....

Should start imo...

I cracked a Sunday can....

Here we go.

https://x.com/mufcscoop/status/1700960130865541156?s=46&t=46osAsCMaSbh7vgQsN2lEQ

Hit the post, did this. Goals Schmoals

https://x.com/tonanesthetic/status/1700966425437880776?s=46&t=bfVvPcxzFISmV5ixy0aAOQ

Good, isn’t he?

He looks better than I expected but we need to change the way we play to get the best out of him. Obviously Rashford should have passed more but nobody else was able to get the ball to him in a position where he could hurt the opposition. He always got it with his back to goal. He'd did a great job of holding the ball up and passing it on to another player but he would rarely get it back after he made a move. Shame because his speed and power should cause big problems for just teams.

Originally Posted by Dr Stranger

Good, isn’t he?

0/2

Brilliant ain't he...

He'll struggle to get more than 15 goals this season with the appalling service he'll get from the rest of the side.

Good effort though.

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

0/2

Brilliant ain't he...

Originally Posted by Bunker Buster

0/2

Brilliant ain't he...

ffs

he scored yesterday (ball wasn't out)

Originally Posted by NedKelly

ffs

Only by a foot

Originally Posted by larry

he scored yesterday (ball wasn't out)

It was out.

hawkeye birds eye view would prove it was in, but that technology isn't available so var shouldn't have overruled. the freeze-frame provided was not from the perfect angle as seen when comparing the angle of the goal frame versus that of the goal line.

a dangerous precedent when they are aware they don't have the technology available to change these tight decisions with 100% certainty but still choose to do so.

It would probably be easier just to change the rule to what people think it is.

Originally Posted by larry

hawkeye birds eye view would prove it was in, but that technology isn't available so var shouldn't have overruled. the freeze-frame provided was not from the perfect angle as seen when comparing the angle of the goal frame versus that of the goal line.

a dangerous precedent when they are aware they don't have the technology available to change these tight decisions with 100% certainty but still choose to do so.

Originally Posted by windy waffles

It was out.

If Brighton had been playing at Anfield last Saturday instead of Old Trafford then var would have awarded the home side a Goal in that exact same situation we all know that

Originally Posted by Gordon Hill

If Brighton had been playing at Anfield last Saturday instead of Old Trafford then var would have awarded the home side a Goal in that exact same situation we all know that

We are you talking about that now ffs?

Glad The Ras Dog is off the mark.

He looked dead after 60 minutes. He could barely stand by the time he went off. We need him fitter quickly.

It's huge for him that he got his goal. Hopefully he pushes on now.