Looks like Spurs have got Palacios

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Very sensible then. I really hope Spurs go down, think i'd laugh for a full day.

I would rather West Ham go down the corrupt bastards.

How can you get away with using a player who is still owned by a private company?

Originally Posted by The Withered Hand

I would rather West Ham go down the corrupt bastards.

How can you get away with using a player who is still owned by a private company?

Dunno, how can we?

I think you give them £10M and offer a big thumbs up for the cameras.

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

both were under 5 years ago but ill let you off with that mistake.

hollers asked if "west ham would sell to spurs" i took this (rightly or wrongly) to mean do west ham have a rivalry where by they simply refuse to do business with spurs. if you look at the players gone both ways in recent years then no, there is no reason why west ham would refuse to do business.

the argument from carrick is levy/redknapp have £#%&!ed up the deal, my argument is that a) there is no evidence to back this up and b) bellamy would have ultimately signed for city anyway so trying to use it against levy/redknapp is pointless.

i await your inevitable child like reply

You don't have to explain what you meant by your posts to hollers, it was plainly obvious...just totally irrelevent.

As to the issue of whether Spurs £#%&!ed up the deal there is indeed no evidence to back this up and I would maintain my point about West Ham not strengthening a rival. I would also maintian that, despite his denials, Harry tried to unsettle Bellamy. And succeeded.
As to your assertion that Bellamy would have signed for City in any case may I point you back to your post and suggest there is also no evidence that Bellamy would have signed for City regardless. Indeed, there is some rumour that Spurs was his preferred choice for a variety of reasons.

Kanoute
Etherington
Zamora
Davenport
Defoe
Carrick

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

how has it been proved exactly, by you posting an article written by a know nothing spurs hating bitch?

You're not taking this too well are you mate

Your making out as if City came in and offered £20 million

They both had the same bid accepted and Bellemy chose Spurs, issa fact.

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Dunno, how can we?

Stop ruining my posts.

Originally Posted by The Withered Hand

Stop ruining my posts.

Sorry, wasn't exactly subtle.

Originally Posted by Carrick

You're not taking this too well are you mate

Your making out as if City came in and offered £20 million

They both had the same bid accepted and Bellemy chose Spurs, issa fact.

im not arsed about bellamy, i think £12m or whatever is a lot of money for bellamy. dont rate him at all.

but you say west ham accepted the bid, surely if they didnt want to sell to spurs they wouldnt have accepted it?

do you not think, after comparing wages on offer, bellamy was ultimately going to chose city regardless? obviously we dont know what was on offer, but i think its fair to presume city would offer a lot more than spurs

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Sorry, wasn't exactly subtle.

You want to see the number of subtle ones I have had tumbleweed blow through.

Subtle doesn't work on here, somebody would have bit.

Originally Posted by Carrick

But that's been proved wrong hasn't it?


You're in dream land if you think that Spurs haven't £#%&!ed up here.

Spurs offered the same money as Citeh, but wanted to pay it over a long period in instalments. Bruce has been complaining about the same thing regarding their Palacios offer.

Originally Posted by Ether

Spurs offered the same money as Citeh, but wanted to pay it over a long period in instalments. Bruce has been complaining about the same thing regarding their Palacios offer.

a very wise business decision in the current climate im sure most would agree.

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

a very wise business decision in the current climate im sure most would agree.

Not as wise as avoiding relegation

Originally Posted by dodger

Not as wise as avoiding relegation

which spurs will easily do. with or without bellamy & palacios.

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

which spurs will easily do. with or without bellamy & palacios.

Easily eh? By how many points do you think?

Originally Posted by dodger

Easily eh? By how many points do you think?

i think they will finish at least 15 points above the relegation zone. depending on who else comes in probably more.

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

i think they will finish at least 15 points above the relegation zone. depending on who else comes in probably more.

Thanks

Originally Posted by dodger

Thanks

what?

UPDATE on westham gate

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,195...823314,00.html

"I was keen to get him. But once Man City come in, it is very difficult to compete. They are working on another level compared to almost everybody else

thankyou

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

http://www.skysports.com/story/0,195...823314,00.html



thankyou

Wow! Well I'm convinced. After all if Harry says so then it's gospel, especially where transfers are concerned. He has a reputation for honesty. Thanks for that

Originally Posted by dodger

Wow! Well I'm convinced. After all if Harry says so then it's gospel, especially where transfers are concerned. He has a reputation for honesty. Thanks for that

yeah but compared to daily mail articles written by a woman ffs!?

Originally Posted by Ginlarde

yeah but compared to daily mail articles written by a woman ffs!?

What has gender got to do with it?