Phil Jones

https://twitter.com/vishy_united/status/1410851777474224129?s=20

Well I guess if anyone knew these things it would be Vishy.

Originally Posted by suedeshoes

Well I guess if anyone knew these things it would be Vishy.

I think the [MEN] means it's from the Evening News..

There can’t be a single person who doesn’t think letting Jones go is a good idea…except Woody.

It does show that we've truly managed contracts by spreadsheet formula and people being worth more when they're in contract. It almost feels like Gill left Woody a guide to financial management in football and the chinless wonder has skipped two out of three chapters as he's flicked through it.

Originally Posted by dunk

I think the [MEN] means it's from the Evening News..

Assumed it was a disparaging comment about the patriarchy

Originally Posted by Sapien

Assumed it was a disparaging comment about the patriarchy

It was men that gave him that deal

There have been worse players at Utd over the years but I genuinely can't think of any as completely %@#$&!ated as our Phil.

Originally Posted by Pop

There have been worse players at Utd over the years but I genuinely can't think of any as completely %@#$&!ated as our Phil.

He's become more of a joke than Winston Bogarde.

Originally Posted by dunk

https://twitter.com/vishy_united/sta...474224129?s=20

Well, that's not exactly the most unbelievable claim ever is it

https://twitter.com/manutdmen/status/1419605916920463361?s=21

Farewell sweet Prince

Originally Posted by dunk

https://twitter.com/manutdmen/status...920463361?s=21

Farewell sweet Prince

Means nothing if the big lump isn't willing to accept a pay cut. If he leaves we'll probably end up having to pay for it.

More than worth it though.

Originally Posted by Patty_b

Means nothing if the big lump isn't willing to accept a pay cut. If he leaves we'll probably end up having to pay for it.

More than worth it though.

Mutal termination on the cards?

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Mutal termination on the cards?

Only if we pay up a lump sum.

Originally Posted by Patty_b

Means nothing if the big lump isn't willing to accept a pay cut. If he leaves we'll probably end up having to pay for it.

More than worth it though.

what will happen is, whatever his new club pays him, we'll have to add the rest to get to his current wage of 100k a week. He has 3 years left

Originally Posted by windy waffles

Mutal termination on the cards?

Yeah I see Phil Jones giving up 100k per week for the next two years no problem...

If he leaves we'll probably end up paying half of his new contract for the next 3 - 4 years.

Originally Posted by Patty_b

Yeah I see Phil Jones giving up 100k per week for the next two years no problem...

If he leaves we'll probably end up paying half of his new contract for the next 3 - 4 years.

With a lump sum - not leaving with nothing.

Originally Posted by redhegemony

Only if we pay up a lump sum.

Never a more appropriate adjective.

The second case of "£#%&! off Phil" we'll have encountered since Sir Alex retired.

If we’d have been prepared to let him leave on a free when his last contract was up we would have saved ourselves about fifteen million pounds

Why was he given a new contract just a matter of weeks after OGS arrived here? That one has never been explained properly has it.