|
||||
|
||||
Because he's an oddball who likes to try and show opinions up as hypocrisy, failing to realise that opinions change based on evidence.
Heaven forbid we as fans get excited by a new signing £#%&!ing hell, it's almost like we put trust in the scouts, the manager, and the club as a whole to do their due diligence on players. But yeah obviously we're massive hypocrites when the signing turns out to be completely unsuitable and inappropriate and then call it a shit signing because of a glaring issue the club should have picked up on. I specifically remember getting pretty excited about Di Maria. Was brilliant for Madrid, Ronaldo was gutted that he was leaving, big money signing. But according to Bellers I should have known in advance he was going to turn out to be a @#%&! who's wife hated manchester, and should have called it a shit signing in advance. Noted for if we sign Mbappe, just in case it turns out he's no good in the rain i'll be sure to call him shite when he signs. Hopefully then i'll avoid the nonce behaviour of getting multi quoted every 5 minutes. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
As you said we’ve made lots of good signings who haven’t worked out. How is that the club making shit signings? It’s just another lazy narrative to deflect away from the piss poor management we’ve had to endure. “Ooh ten hags had to deal with ten years of shit signings!!” What you mean the players we all wanted to sign? |
|
|||
|
|||
Quote:
The structure of the club is allowed to be held accountable seeing as they are literally paid to find players who are good and improve the team. Whether everyone thinks they are good signings has no baring on professionals being paid to make sure those signings are good. Having a go at fans for getting behind new signings |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Post - 10 years of shit signings Me - most have our signings have been good The usual clowns - you’re full of shit bellers most of our signings have been good |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
The rest of them I wouldn't say I actually wanted signed. Especially not Fellaini, who should have been elbowing people at Stoke. And Schneiderlin preferred Arsenal. Surely you can tell the difference between actively wanting a player and giving him a chance once he's arrived? It's not up to us, after all. |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
|
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Ok let me ask you this. We get Mbappe in the summer, that’s a good signing right? We all agree on that and we’d all be pretty excited yeah? Ten hags still here, he hates the system and has a shocking year and his wife hates Manchester. He leaves after 12 months. Is that still regarded as a good signing or is is man united signing shit players? |
|
||||
|
||||
Quote:
Even with Falcao, I was buzzing because you've seen the guy so you're hoping and positive that he's still got it. I think Fellaini was an openly despised signing that none of us wanted* - even though he did more for us than most of the "better" shit @#%&! signings. *I'll wait for Bellers to find a post of mine being really up for signing Fellaini now, of course |
|
||||
|
||||
But obviously my point is wrong
|
|
||||
|
||||
I dont even know what your point is tbh (on this subject), I just replied to the post of shit signings. Some were predictably shit, some were surprisingly shit.
It's more indicative of the lack of direction and diligence at the club since post Ferie but I can't blame anyone for getting excited over bringing in a quality or a new player. As has been said, it's not our fault how they've performed when they've actually got on the field. |
Similar Threads for: 10 Hag should be sacked tonight | ||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
Ole has to be sacked TONIGHT | saffers | Football | 3361 | 22-11-2022 07:47 PM |
Ole sacked TONIGHT | saffers | Football | 64 | 21-11-2021 02:42 PM |
Mou has to be sacked TONIGHT! | Hyman_Roth | Football | 105 | 22-02-2021 07:05 PM |
Ole needs to be sacked tonight! | Mr_Ed | Football | 30 | 24-04-2019 12:29 PM |
Mourinho needs to be sacked TONIGHT | Lok | Football | 1830 | 20-12-2018 08:02 AM |