Quote:
Originally Posted by Bunker Buster
Luke Shaw, United, food, who the £#%&! thinks of Hope Shaw...
|
it was in the £#%&!ing post.
Quote:
Originally Posted by no fun
Hope shaw isn’t involved
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hyman_Roth
Jem, given the lengths he seems to go to to avoid criticising them whilst focussing on some flaky aspect of those criticising. Weird as £#%&!.
|
what's the value in criticising the tories for not ensuring, one way or another, that children get enough to eat?
it's £#%&!ing obvious that any government should do this (and I have already stated as much and said I would pay more tax to get it done, too).
as for the lengths I go to avoid criticising the government, it is astonishing the lengths you will go to to avoid noticing my comments on boris, patel, raab, covid, the economy, brexit, etc. what you mean is that I don't automatically meet every £#%&!ing thread with "I blame the evil tories and anyone who would even consider voting for them for being evil. if only that nice mr corbyn had got in. but starmer is the dog's %@#$&!s."
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chris Quayd
However with talk of a new FOTY category for exactly his archetypal sanguine style that induces rage.......
|
wait.... what?!