let's just say we had torres

Santa Cruz would be a good signing imo.

Anyone that can head a £#%&!ing football would be a good signing.

[SIZE="1"]Andy Cole is still knocking them in for Burnley

Originally Posted by Peter griffin

Anyone that can head a £#%&!ing football would be a good signing.

[SIZE="1"]Andy Cole is still knocking them in for Burnley

"Fergie, sign him up! Fergie, Fergie, sign him up!"

Koppas 9

£#%&! it your signed you've got to be in better physical condition than Louis @#%&!ting Saha

Originally Posted by Peter griffin

£#%&! it your signed you've got to be in better physical condition than Louis @#%&!ting Saha

Is this a hypothetical Tevez and Torres double whammy? Or was it one or the other?

Torres would've been fantastic with United on the rampage. But against the massed defences we usually face I'm not so sure.

The way United play has enabled Ronaldo to score 30 goals and counting so far, as well as leading to our 3 popularly recognised goalscorers netting 33 between them. All this obsessing over the need for a striker conveniently ignores that.

The midfield have started to chip in lately, and whether or not they carry that on, along with a few from the defenders, will probably prove the decisive factor in some of the tight games coming up. Our brilliant attack is not the problem - far from it, in fact.

glad I could bring a little happiness into your life

Originally Posted by Tumescent Throb

Is this a hypothetical Tevez and Torres double whammy? Or was it one or the other?

Torres would've been fantastic with United on the rampage. But against the massed defences we usually face I'm not so sure.

The way United play has enabled Ronaldo to score 30 goals and counting so far, as well as leading to our 3 popularly recognised goalscorers netting 33 between them. All this obsessing over the need for a striker conveniently ignores that.

The midfield have started to chip in lately, and whether or not they carry that on, along with a few from the defenders, will probably prove the decisive factor in some of the tight games coming up. Our brilliant attack is not the problem - far from it, in fact.

torres doesn't score when his team are on the rampage. he's a good get-out option up front on his own. a bit of a turbo-donkey is what we need. and, against packed defences, he has more chance in the air than rooney or tevez. oh, god... I don't even want to think about the headers tevez has missed this season even when unmarked!

there is nothing in the way we would play with a centre-forward that would stop ronaldo scoring. with someone in the middle who could win and hold up the ball, ronaldo would be running onto a lot. torres is quick enough to move around up front too and not just to be a target man.

a young andy cole would be perfect, of course.

[SIZE="7"]Huntelaar

maybe we could ask torres to come over to carrington a couple of days a week to show wayne how to beat a keeper one-on-one?






joke.

Originally Posted by Carrick

[SIZE="7"]Huntelaar

the only time huntelaar will ever be big and bold.

he's what crouch would be like if he'd smoked 60 a day from the age of 6.

:0)

Originally Posted by jem

the only time huntelaar will ever be big and bold.

he's what crouch would be like if he'd smoked 60 a day from the age of 6.

:0)

Originally Posted by Rhodzy

Glen Johnson was excellent yesterday. Huntelaar would probably be our best option given the price range as I can't see us spending £20m+ on a Benzema or Berbatov. Huntelaar would probably cost £12m and their is also Fabiano who has a buyout clause of £8m.On Torres he's not a terrific finisher, he's just in a fantastic run of form.

Isnt it £8m for 50% ownership?