Mary D's vandalised

Originally Posted by believe

oh £#%&!ing hell Foe!! I thought they meant enemy

omg!

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

'foe @#%&!s' or the non-threatening font choice?

Both and in combo.

foe bit is stupid, brings us down to their level.

ruined it

at least in ground pre match will be better

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Both and in combo.

I think the artist is inexperienced and up to now has generally plyed his trade tagging bus shelters. The curly detailing on his letters don't convince.

Block capitals are key when attempting threatening, football related graffiti.

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

I think the artist is inexperienced and up to now has generally plyed his trade tagging bus shelters. The curly detailing on his letters don't convince.

Block capitals are key when attempting threatening, football related graffiti.

I think that's a very good analysis of the reasoning behind such a weak font choice. Cheers.

Think the message is there to make it clear he's an idiot. Possibly a "kid bruv" along for his first time?

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

I think the artist is inexperienced and up to now has generally plyed his trade tagging bus shelters. The curly detailing on his letters don't convince.

Block capitals are key when attempting threatening, football related graffiti.

that f is proper gay too. i'm surprised they didn't dot the i's with lovehearts.

Maybe it was Ravel.

Originally Posted by carlosartorial

I think the artist is inexperienced and up to now has generally plyed his trade tagging bus shelters. The curly detailing on his letters don't convince.

Block capitals are key when attempting threatening, football related graffiti.

What he needs is an uppercase, tightly spaced, bold helvetica or impact. It looks like hes gone for the comic sans look or curlz which is a shame.

The "MANCHESTER IS RED" bit's are a far better choice I contend.

Utter #@&%!s for adding the Foe bit, no doubt the same mongs who complain about City singing Munich songs, obviously not on the same level of tragedy but classless all the same.

Originally Posted by safingtons

Utter #@&%!s for adding the Foe bit, no doubt the same mongs who complain about City singing Munich songs, obviously not on the same level of tragedy but classless all the same.

How's it not on the same level of tragedy you daft @#%&!?

Originally Posted by believe

How's it not on the same level of tragedy you daft @#%&!?

I wouldn't compare the death of one man on a football pitch, to an airplane crashing where a lot of people died.

Originally Posted by safingtons

I wouldn't compare the death of one man on a football pitch, to an airplane crashing where a lot of people died.

I would

Originally Posted by believe

How's it not on the same level of tragedy you daft @#%&!?

your original interpretation of "foe @#%&!" is the real tragedy here

Originally Posted by thenorthwillriseagain

your original interpretation of "foe @#%&!" is the real tragedy here

be quiet.

Originally Posted by believe

be quiet.

go eat a falaffel

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

The "MANCHESTER IS RED" bit's are a far better choice I contend.

And 34 YEARS. And especially @#%&!.

It was only the Foe bit that blotted the copybook.

Originally Posted by thenorthwillriseagain

go eat a falaffel

or a falafail?

Originally Posted by hopkins

or a falafail?