So Hazard 'won' 7 penalties for Lille

Originally Posted by Alan

WTF? He was going down before there was any contact. The horrible shit stubbled gay @#%&!.

glad someone else saw it the same way

Originally Posted by wiganste

Wasn't a pelanty on Welbeck imo.

If there was contact, it was probably outside of the area. It was just Welbeck being a bit shit imo.

that's what I feared, ah well

halfway to his total of last season already

Originally Posted by Alan

WTF? He was going down before there was any contact. The horrible shit stubbled gay @#%&!.

so if the defender hadn't lunged in he would have went down anyway? would he £#%&!.

He's tricky and fast, knocks the ball past the defender and draws the foul. its a pen. simple. contact is contact.

Originally Posted by rogieop

so if the defender hadn't lunged in he would have went down anyway? would he £#%&!.

He's tricky and fast, knocks the ball past the defender and draws the foul. its a pen. simple. contact is contact.

If. But. He went down before the defender touched him. It's a dive.

NFT.

'draws the foul' it's football, not basketball ffs

just because there's contact doesn't mean there's a foul

Originally Posted by Alan

If. But. He went down before the defender touched him. It's a dive.

NFT.

No he didnt. It was a foul. the defender put his body across him and made no contact with the ball.

Take off the blinkers.

Originally Posted by Alan

If. But. He went down before the defender touched him. It's a dive.

NFT.

so because the defender clumsily cuts accross his path without touching the ball, hazard is supposed to hurdle him and play on at his own disadvantage?

Its a situation where a talented player has taken an average player for the piece of piss he is.

Stone wall pen every day of the week.

Dont see what everyones problem is with hazard.

Are we jealous?

Originally Posted by rogieop

No he didnt. It was a foul. the defender put his body across him and made no contact with the ball.

Take off the blinkers.

See my previous post. Getting bored already.

He's much better at it than Young.

Originally Posted by utd99

He's much better at it than Young.

Keep reading those tabloids

Dear £#%&!_KFC

can you please add a poll to the thread and see if people reckon it was a dive or a pelanty because this is seriously grinding my £#%&!ing gears.

How can anyone say its a dive is beyond me.

Originally Posted by utd99

He's much better at it than Young.

We can just hope that he gets the same "reputation" that Young did with officials

Originally Posted by Alan

Keep reading those tabloids

Give me a £#%&!ing break. Open your eyes.

Originally Posted by Alan

Keep reading those tabloids

Your £#%&!ing clueless Alan

Originally Posted by king kong

Your £#%&!ing clueless Alan

£#%&! off bert.

Originally Posted by rogieop

so if the defender hadn't lunged in he would have went down anyway? would he £#%&!.

He's tricky and fast, knocks the ball past the defender and draws the foul. its a pen. simple. contact is contact.

It can be both, tbf - a dive and a foul. I guess technically in those situations if the dive precedes the foul it should be a free-kick to the defending team. Far too difficult for the referee to judge that, mind

Are there any gifs of this mussels-eating @#%&!'s dive?

What's wrong with mussels?

And tonight's incident was a pretty blatant pelanty. Give over.