Sorry Scholes has to go

Originally Posted by wiganste

Not biting Marion

yep because that was all %@#$&!s?

scholes was punishing pompey by probing them for 90 minutes and he wasnt sitting infront of the back four with o shea?

Originally Posted by marlo stansfield

yep because that was all %@#$&!s?

scholes was punishing pompey by probing them for 90 minutes and he wasnt sitting infront of the back four with o shea?

Marlon,

Your game analysis makes Steve Claridge's sound as if it came from Hansen. If you are doing the usual by courting controversy we should just assume the opposite of what you are saying.

Scholes played well tonight looked good, ran the game and was a joy to watch.

Originally Posted by Leroyloverod

Marlon,

Your game analysis makes Steve Claridge's sound as if it came from Hansen. If you are doing the usual by courting controversy we should just assume the opposite of what you are saying.

Scholes played well tonight looked good, ran the game and was a joy to watch.

ran the game?
he hardly any impact attacking wise.

in run a game that you win, you would definately need to have some.

evra and tevez did more to run the game that scholes or dont you agree?

i'd have thought by now people would have learned that the marlos' comments on football are about as useful as a jam umbrella. they're only interested in justifying what they said, irrespective of what actually happens.

just (yet) another way to turn threads about anything into threads about marlos. give it a £#%&!ing rest and enjoy yet another magnificent performance by the best english football of his generation. he hasn't got too many years left at the top; let's enjoy watching a genius at work while we can.

Another thing marlo is in denial about. lol

Originally Posted by borsuk

i'd have thought by now people would have learned that the marlos' comments on football are about as useful as a jam umbrella. they're only interested in justifying what they said, irrespective of what actually happens.

just (yet) another way to turn threads about anything into threads about marlos. give it a £#%&!ing rest and enjoy yet another magnificent performance by the best english football of his generation. he hasn't got too many years left at the top; let's enjoy watching a genius at work while we can.

oh shut up you silly fat man.

i didnt say scholes played badly did i?
i just said i dont agree with the general opinion of him running the game.

he wasnt even our best player today.
both evra and tevez were more important.

which is why if i was rating players, id give scholes a 6/10 which is about fair.

and tbh you are in no position to talk about football opinions.

Originally Posted by marlo stansfield

oh shut up you silly fat man.

i didnt say scholes played badly did i?
i just said i dont agree with the general opinion of him running the game.

he wasnt even our best player today.
both evra and tevez were more important.

which is why if i was rating players, id give scholes a 6/10 which is about fair.

and tbh you are in no position to talk about football opinions.

m-o-m with 6/10. shit game.

interesting who skysports.com thought was our best midfielder.
http://www.skysports.com/football/us...023068,00.html

Originally Posted by marlo stansfield

interesting who skysports.com thought was our best midfielder.
http://www.skysports.com/football/us...023068,00.html

scholes was voted man of the match.

Originally Posted by wonky no

scholes was voted man of the match.

didnt get a perfect 9 though

Originally Posted by marlo stansfield

interesting who skysports.com thought was our best midfielder.
http://www.skysports.com/football/us...023068,00.html

Paul Scholes got the champagne so I dispute your claim that skysports thought he wasn't the best.

That link is just who twelve year old internet kids thought was the best.

How many times did you vote you crank?

Originally Posted by armchair

Paul Scholes got the champagne so I dispute your claim that skysports thought he wasn't the best.

its just a page where excitable young children , who have no idea how to watch the game, go to vote on their bestiest play. funnily enough they agree with marleen

Originally Posted by armchair

Paul Scholes got the champagne so I dispute your claim that skysports thought he wasn't the best.

That link is just who twelve year old internet kids thought was the best.

How many times did you vote you crank?

nope. there are two columns.

sky sports rating and then the fans rating...

look again.

Originally Posted by wonky no

its just a page where excitable young children , who have no idea how to watch the game, go to vote on their bestiest play. funnily enough they agree with marleen

who gave scholes a 9?

sky sports or the public?

Scholes was excellent last night.

Scholes must go. Oh wait...