United Forum
Go Back   United Forum > Manchester United > Football
Reply
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:07 AM
Whip Hubley
 
Thumbs up

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
jose is a dick.
You're absolutely clueless
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:08 AM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dunk
I do get the impression you haven't actually watched TFM play, but instead have built up a Bryan Robson/Claude Makelele hybrid vision of him in your mind..
that's because you are an idiot, not because I am idiot.

have you watched jones, darmian or blind recently?

I'd like tfm developed, not regressing at f***ing palace. he has potential. they don't.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:10 AM
Whip Hubley
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
that's because you are an idiot, not because I am idiot.

have you watched jones, darmian or blind recently?

I'd like tfm developed, not regressing at f***ing palace. he has potential. they don't.
So er, we should stick an unproven and - quite frankly rash - player at right back (or are you suggesting CB?!?) just because.... well, just because?

I could just about understand if this was Tuanzebe we were talking about... but it's not. Struggling to understand where your hard on for TFM comes from. Or is it just that you don't like to be wrong? Possibly?..... Jem?


TFM would not get games here because he is rash and nowhere near the finished article, AKA a liability. Presumably he will get games at palace where no one gives a f*** if he gives away the odd penalty. At least I don't.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:14 AM
Billy Redface
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
that's because you are an idiot, not because I am idiot.

have you watched jones, darmian or blind recently?

I'd like tfm developed, not regressing at f**king palace. he has potential. they don't.
Why isn't sending him to palace development ?
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:18 AM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Whip Hubley
So er, we should stick an unproven and - quite frankly rash - player at right back (or are you suggesting CB?!?) just because.... well, just because?

I could just about understand if this was Tuanzebe we were talking about... but it's not. Struggling to understand where your hard on for TFM comes from. Or is it just that you don't like to be wrong? Possibly?..... Jem?


TFM would not get games here because he is rash and nowhere near the finished article, AKA a liability. Presumably he will get games at palace where no one gives a f*** if he gives away the odd penalty. At least I don't.
I like tuanzers as well. you saying smalling and jones aren't rash? how about vidic? is blind not slow and darmian not utterly pointless?

how can I be wrong about giving tfm a chance? of course he will be "unproven" until then. at least he's not already proven to be inadequate (and looked good when van gaal used him).
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:21 AM
Tumescent Throb
 
Default

i expect us to dominate more games this season than last. i expect us to be in cruise mode a lot more often in the last 30 of league games at home. and so i think TFM, zebe and a few others would have plenty of chance for minutes ... hopefully this means zebesie and pereira will get used more.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:22 AM
Sparky***
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by dunk
I do get the impression you haven't actually watched TFM play, but instead have built up a Bryan Robson/Claude Makelele hybrid vision of him in your mind..


He'll be sent off at least twice whilst on loan.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:22 AM
jem
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Billy Redface
Why isn't sending him to palace development ?
different pressure, different game. suppose it's better than just not playing him, but it is a risk. I am more pissed off about the players we are playing.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:24 AM
Whip Hubley
 
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by jem
I like tuanzers as well. you saying smalling and jones aren't rash? how about vidic? is blind not slow and darmian not utterly pointless?

how can I be wrong about giving tfm a chance? of course he will be "unproven" until then. at least he's not already proven to be inadequate (and looked good when van gaal used him).
Ok, fundamental difference of view - you want jose to play TFM in our first team because he may turn out to be good. I'd rather play an experienced, tried and test Darmian or Valencia at right back because they make less mistakes and we're more likely to win stuff.

I see absolutely no issue with sending TFM on loan to gain experience instead of playing the odd game here.


PS I'd rather smalling and jones were nowhere near the squad but we don't get everything we want. Hopefully Tuanzers will 'ease' them out of any contention.
 
Old 07-08-2017, 11:27 AM
20 times
 
Default

Losing our soul. First Mou sold Welbeck, now this
Reply
Thread Tools
Similar Threads for: Super Timmy fosu .... Leaving
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
PAID: willsuper timmy cahill score tonite puressence Settled 0 23-01-2008 10:51 AM
PAID: Bet.. Super Timmy Cahill To Score Tonite puressence Settled 0 12-12-2007 05:20 PM
super timmy cahill puressence Main Forum 10 06-12-2007 10:31 AM
super timmy cahill puressence Main Forum 27 26-11-2007 11:28 AM
timmy cahill? irk Main Forum 3 12-11-2007 09:50 AM
All times are GMT. The time now is 07:18 PM.

Copyright 2006 - 2018 utdforum.com. This site is in no way affiliated to Manchester United Football Club.