Carrick's 'red card' against Milan

Did that get rescinded?

like £#%&!

yes

Is it yes or no?

I didn't think it could be as you can't appeal yellows - but it shouldn't have been for him anyway.

No.

We'll play 442 against Milan.

Valencia Scholes Fletch Nani

Rooney Berbatov

Originally Posted by koppas

Is it yes or no?

I didn't think it could be as you can't appeal yellows - but it shouldn't have been for him anyway.

Second yellow for kicking the ball away wasn't it ?

Originally Posted by koppas

Is it yes or no?

I didn't think it could be as you can't appeal yellows - but it shouldn't have been for him anyway.

Given the Fletcher debacle against Arsenal in the semi, do you really think anything will get rescinded?

Originally Posted by Albert Tatlock

Second yellow for kicking the ball away wasn't it ?

I thought the card was for a foul commited by Evra - the reason being I remember being shocked as to how the referee got them confused.

Originally Posted by safingtons

No.

We'll play 442 against Milan.

Valencia Scholes Fletch Nani

Rooney Berbatov

Cheers Sir Alex. Keep up the good work.

Originally Posted by koppas

I thought the card was for a foul commited by Evra - the reason being I remember being shocked as to how the referee got them confused.



Cheers Sir Alex. Keep up the good work.

No. Evra fouledk free kick but no yellow. Carrick kicked the ball away, dissent, second yellow, off

Originally Posted by Albert Tatlock

No. Evra fouledk free kick but no yellow. Carrick kicked the ball away, dissent, second yellow, off

Cheers bert.

Thread closed.

Originally Posted by safingtons

No.

We'll play 442 against Milan.

Valencia Scholes Fletch Nani

Rooney Berbatov

No we won't.
Park will play instead of Berbatov.

Originally Posted by MJ Ramone

No we won't.
Park will play instead of Berbatov.

I hope you're right, personally.

4-4-2

Originally Posted by dunk

I hope you're right, personally.

4-4-2

Agreed.

Originally Posted by dunk

I hope you're right, personally.

4-4-2

Its funny how maligned 4-4-2 is now

Originally Posted by thrills_pills_bellyaches

Its funny how maligned 4-4-2 is now

I've hated it since Keane got old tbh.

Originally Posted by dunk

I've hated it since Keane got old tbh.

Would you agree that in order to get the best out of the current 4-3-3 we need to get a top class attacking midfielder and a left winger? For all it's current solidity and the football it's produced, it is incredibly reliant on Rooney.

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

Would you agree that in order to get the best out of the current 4-3-3 we need to get a top class attacking midfielder and a left winger? For all it's current solidity and the football it's produced, it is incredibly reliant on Rooney.

And Park

Originally Posted by dodger

And Park

I like Park but he's not exactly the world's top goal threat.

I'd like Nani to show some of the form he had on the right out there tbh, think he did too to an extent in one game recently. Then with a quality attacking midfielder I think we'd really be able to make the most of 4-3-3 if we are gonna continue in that direction.

Originally Posted by MJ Ramone

No we won't.
Park will play instead of Berbatov.

valencia - fletch - scholes - park - nani

park played there in a european game last season didn't he.

think he's more likely to play park than gibson as well tbh. from what saf said after ando's injury he was nailed on to play there...

i'd like to see this:

nani - valencia - scholes - fletch - park

Originally Posted by antonin jablonsky

I like Park but he's not exactly the world's top goal threat.

I'd like Nani to show some of the form he had on the right out there tbh, think he did too to an extent in one game recently. Then with a quality attacking midfielder I think we'd really be able to make the most of 4-3-3 if we are gonna continue in that direction.

ask arsene