Hazard

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Gets himself into so many good areas due to his movement. Can't discount that, and for City he's been more clinical.

Agree Hazard is better but Sterling scored more league goals than Lukaku last season.

I think Sterling Moss would have bagged at least 10 in that city team last season with david silva and de bruyne laying on tap ins every week.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

I think Sterling Moss would have bagged at least 10 in that city team last season with david silva and de bruyne laying on tap ins every week.

Sane only got ten, so he must barely be of standard.

Sterling is a good player. 23 goals last year for a 23 year old. Been unlucky with England.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Gets himself into so many good areas due to his movement. Can't discount that, and for City he's been more clinical.

Agree Hazard is better but Sterling scored more league goals than Lukaku last season.

£#%&!ing hell thats tragic if true

Originally Posted by Sparky***

I think Sterling Moss would have bagged at least 10 in that city team last season with david silva and de bruyne laying on tap ins every week.

Kate Moss would have tapped some in...

sterling has fantastic movement and pace so if you do a brilliant move that requires the last guy to knock it into an empty net he's great but hazard can do everything sterling does plus he can score goals from nothing.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Sane only got ten, so he must barely be of standard.

Sterling is a good player. 23 goals last year for a 23 year old. Been shite with England.

Corrected for you

Originally Posted by browser

£#%&!ing hell thats tragic if true

Yes, it's quite unbelievable that a bloke who played in a side who scored 100 goals last season with the best players in the league laying on chances for him, scored more goals than a striker relying on Antonio 'one good cross a month' Valencia, Jesse 'J Lingz' Lingard and Scotty McTommyknocker to open up defences for him.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Yes, it's quite unbelievable that a bloke who played in a side who scored 100 goals last season with the best players in the league laying on chances for him, scored more goals than a striker relying on Antonio 'one good cross a month' Valencia, Jesse 'J Lingz' Lingard and Scotty McTommyknocker to open up defences for him.

https://twitter.com/MarkOgden_/status/1018162490629337088

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Yes, it's quite unbelievable that a bloke who played in a side who scored 100 goals last season with the best players in the league laying on chances for him, scored more goals than a striker relying on Antonio 'one good cross a month' Valencia, Jesse 'J Lingz' Lingard and Scotty McTommyknocker to open up defences for him.

Why was he relying on them rather than Pogba or Sanchez?

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Why was he relying on them rather than Pogba or Sanchez?

Probably because sanchez didn't get there until January and Pogba was injured for about 3 months.

hth.

Id take sterling over hazard any day of the week. Long term he is the better bet.

Sterling extremely underrated. Will only improve im afraid.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Probably because sanchez didn't get there until January and Pogba was injured for about 3 months.

hth.

Right

Imagine what Lukaku would do with both De Bruyne and Hazard supplying him.

Fail to score against anyone decent I expect.

Originally Posted by saffers

Id take sterling over hazard any day of the week. Long term he is the better bet.

Sterling extremely underrated. Will only improve im afraid.

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Right

Imagine what Lukaku would do with both De Bruyne and Hazard supplying him.

Fail to score against anyone decent I expect.

Yeah, sorry pal. Don't know what i was thinking.

I'll let you get back to £#%&! Chelsea and City players.

Originally Posted by saffers

Id take sterling over hazard any day of the week. Long term he is the better bet.

Sterling extremely underrated. Will only improve im afraid.

He’s shite sunshine

Originally Posted by saffers

Id take sterling over hazard any day of the week. Long term he is the better bet.

Sterling extremely underrated. Will only improve im afraid.

Originally Posted by Sparky***

Yeah, sorry pal. Don't know what i was thinking.

I'll let you get back to £#%&! Chelsea and City players.

Haven’t you just been describing City’s players as the best in the league?

Hazard has worked under Benitez, Mourinho and Conte and scored about 70 league goals in six years. Imagine how he'd do under an attacking coach.

More impressive stats given he took one year off

But even without stats he's awesome. Like Luis Figo - his dribbling and playmaking skills don't show up in G+As all the time but he is by far the best player in his teams

Originally Posted by S/Side.Red

Haven’t you just been describing City’s players as the best in the league?

Yeah they won the league pal. Kind of hard to argue against it.